We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Leaving HL without transfer charges
Options
Comments
-
happyarthur wrote: »I`ve been informed that an email should be fine, thanks. What`s a secure message? - I`m a technophobe septuagenarian (it`s legal) and only recently moved on from a quill and squid ink. It took me about half an hour to figure out how to post a reply to naedanger`s post. This second post (of my life) took considerably less! There`s no stopping me now.0
-
I have emailed HL, via secure message, on Saturday. However, no reply to date, despite 2 reminders.
Either they are very busy, or don't care about me!0 -
Email is fine. I would keep the content formal to ensure they treat it as a complaint rather than an enquiry.0
-
-
nxdmsandkaskdjaqd wrote: »I have emailed HL, via secure message, on Saturday. However, no reply to date, despite 2 reminders.
Either they are very busy, or don't care about me!
Same here.
Transfer is going through none the less.0 -
I'm moving my ISA but leaving my SIPP and wonder if that weakens my case for waiver of exit charges. Although why should it? I'm only moving ISA because of their new charging structure.
This thread must be one of the fastest moving.
Any of the experts care to comment?
Also, I was going to close my HL Fund & Share account (automatically opened when I opened my ISA) as I won't be using it and don't want to face hefty closure fees later.
Does the fact that I'm keeping my SIPP there, for now, have any bearing on this?0 -
Does the fact that I'm keeping my SIPP there, for now, have any bearing on this?
Edit: If you want to keep your options open, maybe the best thing to do is secure a free exit on everything. You don't have to make use of it for the SIPP. This may also open the door to fee negotiations on the SIPP.0 -
It will be interesting to see what is happening in a year or two, there is a lot of people that may be jumping from the fat into the fryer with their future wealth.
I would like to see the FCA sort out the issue of exit fees and impose a set-cost for any account closures. Until they do so there will be a constant problem when companies amend their pricing and folk look for the cheapest service again and again. Fixing exit-fees may well be the single best way to force platforms to set and retain pricing at levels the customers would support, until then we will probably see a perpetual stream of people complaining about changing fee structures and exit fees.
Just my 2 cents as they say.0 -
nxdmsandkaskdjaqd wrote: »I have emailed HL, via secure message, on Saturday. However, no reply to date
Meanwhile a positive response from Halifax. They have confirmed ISA eligibility for SWIP Foundation Growth 'B' Accumulation units, which moves them into line with HL and other platforms. This should allow the fund to be transferred from HL to Halifax as stock. Fingers crossed.0 -
It will be interesting to see what is happening in a year or two, there is a lot of people that may be jumping from the fat into the fryer with their future wealth.
I would like to see the FCA sort out the issue of exit fees and impose a set-cost for any account closures. Until they do so there will be a constant problem when companies amend their pricing and folk look for the cheapest service again and again. Fixing exit-fees may well be the single best way to force platforms to set and retain pricing at levels the customers would support, until then we will probably see a perpetual stream of people complaining about changing fee structures and exit fees.
Just my 2 cents as they say.
Not a bad idea but in some ways it would actually be anti competitive, why limit some charges and not others.
So long as the charges are open, and they come down heavily on those firms that try and change terms and conditions up unilaterally.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards