PCN from IG Security

msa123

[IMG][/img]

[IMG][/img]

[IMG][/img]

msa123

4consumerrights wrote: »

msa123 - urgent pm sent!

Thanks, post now edited. And pictures uploaded, anything else please let me know.
Cheers

ps. Can't reply to your pm, error message about your profile exceeding storage space

Stroma

kirkbyinfurnesslad wrote: »

The the IAC COP says (at the moment) that appeals can only come from the driver), this is currently being discussed with the DVLA i believe

Well that's bloody stupid, how can they claim registered keeper liability if the registered keeper cannot appeal? Pofa 2012 doesn't say that the driver only can appeal does it?

kirkbyinfurnesslad_2

Stroma wrote: »

Well that's bloody stupid, how can they claim registered keeper liability if the registered keeper cannot appeal? Pofa 2012 doesn't say that the driver only can appeal does it?

Well thats how i read on Prankys blog,

You just have to platy the game dont you...

4consumerrights

Interesting question here though how will Steve D's outfit PCN parking services services, a trading name for Roxburghe and member of BPA be able to get the RK details for an IPC member?

kirkbyinfurnesslad_2

4consumerrights wrote: »

Interesting question here though how will Steve D's outfit PCN parking services services, a trading name for Roxburghe and member of BPA be able to get the RK details for an IPC member?

It will do it as a back office function . As the member is an ATA member

4consumerrights

kirkbyinfurnesslad wrote: »

It will do it as a back office function . As the member is an ATA member

Yes but are they allowed to do this overlapping both Associations - has there been an FOI request for the IPC/DVLA criteria?


Regardless of which Globe Protection Services Ltd were declared dormant - accounts made up to 2013 and cannot be trading as I G Security because I G Security (Inner Guard Security) Ltd is a separate company and in liquidation (before joining IPC) -should make an interesting appeal.

http://companycheck.co.uk/director/915338730

Mr & Mrs Draycott operate a wonderful array of security services without an SIA licence and proclaim close protection and Handcuff training etc and the following "used" their services

http://www.igsecurity.org/ig-security.html

Various prestigious organizations such as; the BBC, Miss World, Comic Relief as well as many others have used our services.
We are fully supportive of the police and have attended counter terrorism workshops relevant to our industry (Project Griffin and Project Argus).

http://www.igsecurity.org/handcuff-training.html

This course meets the guidelines of the Security Industry and all techniques have been medically risk assessed to the standard of the Institute of Conflict Management. they are currently being taught to the Police, H.M court Services, Enforcement Officers, Mental Health Institutes, Door Supervisors and other organizations. Our technical base covers the following subject matter:
• The law in relation to using reasonable force and self defence
• Using physical intervention as a last resort
• Possible medical implications
• Legal implications of incorrect technique
• Holding & containment skills
• Carrying and holding Handcuffs
• Using Handcuffs
• Deployment of Handcuffs on compliant and non-compliant people

nice all without the adequate SIA licence!

http://www.sia.homeoffice.gov.uk/Pages/acs-roac.aspx?all

HO87

With respect 4cr Global Protection Services Ltd are perfectly at liberty to trade as I G Security. They are not trading as I G Security Ltd and I G Security is a separate legal entity to I G Security Ltd. Provided GPS Ltd file up to date accounts by their required date then the fact they filed dormant accounts at the end of their last trading year is not that relevant. We will see.

Returning to the OP's case the PCN - if I'm reading it correctly (it is a little blurred and the sign is almost entirely illegible) appear to follow the normal "breach of contract" format but as far as I can make out does not specify that. However, the sign appears to set out that the car park is for the use of permit holders only and - as far as I can see - makes no offer. On that basis, no offer = no contract and therefore no charge for breach.

@OP can you post up a better quality photo of the sign so we can be certain?

msa123

HO87 wrote: »

@OP can you post up a better quality photo of the sign so we can be certain?

That's the picture from the paymypcn.net website, they have a couple of pictures of the car and this one of the sign. I've not been there myself, but i'll try get round sometime tomorrow and get my own pictures of the signs and post on here.
Thanks

Scouse_Magic

msa123 wrote: »

That's the picture from the paymypcn.net website, they have a couple of pictures of the car and this one of the sign. I've not been there myself, but i'll try get round sometime tomorrow and get my own pictures of the signs and post on here.
Thanks

Pay nothing...Its all the same company...it will die a death