meaning of "given"

Charles1968

On 12 October 2013 at Virginia Quays, the appellant was issued with a parking charge notice for breaching the terms and conditions of the parking site. It is the operator’s case that the appellant’s vehicle was parked without displaying a valid permit despite signage at the site to indicate that this was necessary to do so. There is photographic evidence to support that the appellant’s vehicle was not displaying a valid permit. The appellant has made a number of submissions, however, I will only elaborate on the one submission that I am allowing this appeal on, namely that the parking charge amount is not a genuine pre-estimate of loss. The burden is on the operator to prove that the parking charge is a genuine pre-estimate of loss. The operator has not produced a breakdown of the costs incurred as a result of the alleged breach and has therefore failed to establish a genuine pre-estimate of loss. Therefore, in consideration of all the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that the operator has discharged the burden. Accordingly, this appeal must be allowed. Farah Ahmad Assessor

Thanks coupon-mad & redx.

Up yours P4Parking & nighthawk.

ampersand

Stroma wrote: »

The letter if sent must be with you on day 14, which means it should be posted by day 12 to ensure that. I believe there is an extra day if the parking incident is on the weekend. You look at the date of the NtK and date on the envelope for postage.

########
Hello Stroma,
I know this one's [predictably, happily]done and dusted, but many ppc's now send their party invitations-to-pay via UK Mail , and similar, which have no postmarks of any kind.

Coupon-mad

Charles1968 wrote: »

Thanks coupon-mad & redx.

Up yours P4Parking & nighthawk.

Well done - as expected of course!

HO87

ampersand wrote: »

########
Hello Stroma,
I know this one's [predictably, happily]done and dusted, but many ppc's now send their party invitations-to-pay via UK Mail , and similar, which have no postmarks of any kind.

In a civil court if you, as the recipient of a NtK, were to provide in a written statement or as part of a defence with a statement of truth attached to it, a clear account showing that it arrived with you on, say Day 15, then that is sufficient to rebut the presumption that it arrived 2 business days after it was posted if that would have put it within the 14 days permitted. The burden of proof is the balance of probabilities.