Appealing NTK by PE

Umkomaas

raptor wrote: »

EDIT: I’ve got picture of the car park but can’t upload them as I’m a newbie

Here you go - as per PM.

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=28tv6o&s=5#.Us5IGX8gGSM

ampersand

bod1467 wrote: »

... and getting a (free) certificate of posting from the PO. No need to send recorded/registered - in fact it is better NOT to do so as PPCs have a habit of not signing for them, so the appeal would not be received.

##########
Good morning bod[et bonne anniversaire demain;)]

I'm interested in this view. Please do not judge this as a hi-jack raptor:).
All my emails to the correct arkingpoie oniline addy are returned thus:
1 attachment (60.0 KB)
Download RE Welcome Break website enquiry - Parking.eml (60.0 KB)
RE Welcome Break website enquiry - Parking.emlDownload
Download as zip
** Action required - your e-mail has NOT been processed **

Thank you for contacting ParkingEye.

Please be aware we have recently upgraded our Appeals process to allow submission of Appeals via our Web Site. Please submit appeals using: http://www.parkingeye.co.uk/Appeal

If you cannot use the web form, then please send a written appeal to:
Appeals,
PO Box 565,
Chorley,
PR6 6HT.

Alternatively, to make a debit/credit card payment please telephone 0844 247 2981 or online at https://payments.parkingeye.co.uk

Once again, please note that your e-mail will not be processed.

Thank you
ParkingEye Appeals Team'

Sending anything to that online ref simply produces the same again.
I therefore sent RD letters again yesterday. I have been refused POPLA codes for over a month now.
#######

bod1467

The problem is, if they don't sign for RD letters then you have no proof of the letters being received if/when any court action occurs. Indeed you have proof they HAVEN'T been received.

With a free certificate of posting the item is deemed delivered (served, so received) 2 days after posting (for 1st class) irrespective of whether it was or not. (Interpretations Act 1978 as I recall).

ampersand

Should add, RD letters went only because CoP ones have failed to bring any response.
The addressees are primed to expect them.

Coupon-mad

Why not just use the online appeals page ParkingEye mention in their letters? I did when I wrote an appeal for a friend and got it cancelled in a few days. We know they haven't accepted emails for months and although it's in the BPA CoP, no-one at the BPA cares - and after all, I expect PE would say they do have an online webpage for people to submit stuff to them.

ampersand

Thanks c-m,
That's how I began, but nothing ever went through. All submissions returned with em shown in blue. Started letters because of that.

android26

Umkomaas wrote: »

If it's the one that starts 'Without prejudice, save as to costs', followed by a list of questions for the PPC, forget it. It's too long, it can be misconstrued as not constituting an appeal, ...

Thankfully you followed your "obligations set out in the current Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct" in your response.

raptor

I am submitting RedX's version but with this added point:

4) The alleged offence occurred at night during which the signage is very difficult to see due to no lightning being present. There is also no obvious signage to display the fact that the car-park is 24 hours, 7 days a week as many car parks would not be operating on a Sunday at 7pm when the charge was issued.

Redx

its lighting , not lightning !! lol

I suppose there may have been no lightning as well , lol that would not have helped either

raptor

Redx wrote: »

its lighting , not lightning !! lol

I suppose there may have been no lightning as well , lol that would not have helped either

LOL. thanks mate