We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
WARNING: HERTZ Europe Cashflow Problems?
Options

TurnUpForTheBooks_2
Posts: 436 Forumite
We hired a cheapish car online from Firefly (Hertz 'older cars' hire brand) in Milan Bergamo in mid September for 120 euros and it was debited from our card at the time as "CARHIRE" but with little or no extra info.
We checked very carefully when we returned it that all was in order (fuel correct/no damage) and nothing more to pay. I am a moneysaving expert, an insurance expert (cut my teeth in the industry - we use our own annual rental car insurance and never buy any extra cover from the car hire company) and for years have been very adept at detecting credit card malpractices such as DCC and strange practices like double-swiping the card in a second machine. I question everything. I am no pushover for hidden charges. I even got them very reluctantly to sign the papers "CAR CHECK OK" because their off airport pound was not manned when we returned the car.
I did not make any driving or parking faux pas so nothing should be debited late on that score either.
On 30th December AUTONOLEGGIO HERTZ have debited 135 euros.
Do they have year end cashflow problems ?
We checked very carefully when we returned it that all was in order (fuel correct/no damage) and nothing more to pay. I am a moneysaving expert, an insurance expert (cut my teeth in the industry - we use our own annual rental car insurance and never buy any extra cover from the car hire company) and for years have been very adept at detecting credit card malpractices such as DCC and strange practices like double-swiping the card in a second machine. I question everything. I am no pushover for hidden charges. I even got them very reluctantly to sign the papers "CAR CHECK OK" because their off airport pound was not manned when we returned the car.
I did not make any driving or parking faux pas so nothing should be debited late on that score either.
On 30th December AUTONOLEGGIO HERTZ have debited 135 euros.
Do they have year end cashflow problems ?
From the late great Tommy Cooper: "He said 'I'm going to chop off the bottom of one of your trouser legs and put it in a library.' I thought 'That's a turn-up for the books.' "
0
Comments
-
TurnUpForTheBooks wrote: »Do they have year end cashflow problems ?
Quite a bizarre conclusion.
Why not call and ask them?Hope over Fear. #VoteYes0 -
Quite a bizarre conclusion.
Why not call and ask them?
Why is the conclusion bizarre ?
Are you customer facing in business?
Would you use an old mandate to take a double-whammy from a customer more than three months after the contract was completed without telling the customer ? There is never a good reason for such behaviour so I think I am quite entitled to assume the worst of them.From the late great Tommy Cooper: "He said 'I'm going to chop off the bottom of one of your trouser legs and put it in a library.' I thought 'That's a turn-up for the books.' "0 -
Full to Empty policy?0
-
Speed camera?0
-
TurnUpForTheBooks wrote: »I even got them very reluctantly to sign the papers "CAR CHECK OK" because their off airport pound was not manned when we returned the car.
Are you saying you got someone to sign for the car without them seeing/checking it?
Oh, and could you edit your title to something more meaningful, either it is a warning or it is a question, but it is not both. Alternatively, you are trying to get around internet defamation by making a claim about a company then sticking a question mark at the end. Bad form.1. Have you tried to Google the answer?
2. If you were in the other person's shoes, how would you react?
3. Do you want a quick answer or better understanding?0 -
Are you saying you got someone to sign for the car without them seeing/checking it?Oh, and could you edit your title to something more meaningful, either it is a warning or it is a question, but it is not both. Alternatively, you are trying to get around internet defamation by making a claim about a company then sticking a question mark at the end. Bad form.
If Hertz had written to say what it was for, then we might all be the wiser.
Meantime if you have hired from Hertz in 2013, check your card December card transactions - there might be an extra one you weren't expecting with their name on it.From the late great Tommy Cooper: "He said 'I'm going to chop off the bottom of one of your trouser legs and put it in a library.' I thought 'That's a turn-up for the books.' "0 -
But you didn't ask a question. You made a statement and put a question mark at the end.
So, can I check, it appears you returned the car to a different company and asked them to sign, but your argument being they are part of the same group. Is that correct?1. Have you tried to Google the answer?
2. If you were in the other person's shoes, how would you react?
3. Do you want a quick answer or better understanding?0 -
For a debit to come off three months after the hire (depending on when you returned it of course), it sounds a lot like a parking ticket or something similar.
You need to get Hertz to explain the charge.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
whatmichaelsays wrote: »For a debit to come off three months after the hire (depending on when you returned it of course), it sounds a lot like a parking ticket or something similar.
You need to get Hertz to explain the charge.
I agree, but it's also worth noting that the OP didn't rent from Hertz, but their subsidiary, Firefly.1. Have you tried to Google the answer?
2. If you were in the other person's shoes, how would you react?
3. Do you want a quick answer or better understanding?0 -
It's a hell of a leap to decide an eronious charge is a big company about to go under.
I'd consider error or inappropriate practice as 99% likely the reason.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards