We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Need help investing / saving £450,000
Options
Comments
-
gadgetmind wrote: »Sorry, but only a week ago we had someone here wanting to put £500k into an investment bond and the IFA was quoting 3% up front and then ongoing management fees of around 0.5%.
And this isn't a one off, we still case after case after case of real world IFAs coming up with these sorts of figures.
I'm not anti-IFA just anti those who refuse to wave bye-bye to their 3%-5% up front and 0.5% trail for investing in a portfolio of high TER active funds.
If true that is shocking, but it is not what is implied by the MSE main site. I would certainly not condone OP to consult an IFA unless it is based on a single upfront fee based on an hourly rate.0 -
gadgetmind wrote: »However, I do think the OP needs to look at mainly using assets other than cash for the bulk of this money, which means they either need to learn the fundamentals of investing (one book, 3-4 hours, job done!) or use an IFA. Or even better, do both.
absolutely.
DIY is a realistic option, and can save a lot of money when you're dealing £450k.
however, it takes a bit more than following a rather inaccurate prescription in 1 forum post. read a book, or perhaps have a good read on http://monevator.com/0 -
For someone who hasn't got the first clue about investing, and doesn't want to skill themselves up, paying 3% upfront and 0.5% annually thereafter to an IFA might well be the least worst alternative. It's almost definitely a lot better than investing into something someone on some Internet forum suggested. As long as they are sure they are actually dealing with a reputable IFA.
However, it isn't actually very difficult to acquire at least some rudimentary knowledge about investments, which will then enable you to make some more informed decisions. Such as whether you can do it all without an IFA, or what sorts of questions you want to ask your IFA, what sorts of answers you expect from your IFA etc etc etc0 -
doughnutmachine wrote: »why don't you have a look at this (post 212)? it seems to back up my 3% initial fee and 0.5% annual fee?
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/287063
*cough* what is 3% of 450k then? is it not £13,500?
The thread started in 2006 way before RDR.
Anyway hopefully what this thread has shown the OP is that if they are looking at using an IFA then check out the charges first. I doubt (but happy to be proved wrong) that the cost would be anywhere near £13.5k.
Personally I use DIY platforms but unless someone is particularly interested in doing their own research they may want to use an IFA. I might DIY for investments but happy to pay someone to do other jobs for me when I know they can do a far better job that me for decorating or car maintenance for exampleRemember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0 -
The thread started in 2006 way before RDR.
But the post about the 3% initial fee and 0.5% annual fee was dated December 2013.....
Is there some law that a recent internet forum post should be ignored if the thread it was posted on was started a couple of years earlier?
Edit, just saw this:
"However, he says, three likely charging structures are in the picture. One option is a percentage of the investment made. "A lot of people are talking about 3% with a 0.5% annual charge or retainer if the client agrees to an ongoing service," he says."
http://www.iii.co.uk/articles/66195/financial-advice-how-much-will-you-be-charged0 -
I doubt (but happy to be proved wrong) that the cost would be £13.5k.
I can't find the sodding thread, but someone 1-2 weeks ago was deffo asked for 3% of their £500k for setting up a simple investment bond.
Yes, the rules have changed, but not all of the guys with the pinstripes and gold watches have taken in board.I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.
Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.0 -
doughnutmachine wrote: »But the post about the 3% initial fee and 0.5% annual fee was dated December 2013.....
And I assume you noted that 3 IFAs answering that post all said that 3% on £500k was excessive?
The point is, like every other business around, is to shop around when looking for an IFA.0 -
gadgetmind wrote: »I can't find the sodding thread, but someone 1-2 weeks ago was deffo asked for 3% of their £500k for setting up a simple investment bond.
I think you're probably thinking of the same one that doughnutmachine refered to:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2870630 -
doughnutmachine wrote: »Lol, it's funny, I think going to an IFA with 450k is bad advice. If the OP goes to an IFA the IFA will charge an initial 3% then an annual 0.5%. Or £13,500 and £2250.....
All for dumbed down advice that's designed so that the client cant sue the IFA.I am a Chartered Financial Planner
Anything I say on the forum is for discussion purposes only and should not be construed as personal financial advice. It is vitally important to do your own research before acting on information gathered from any users on this forum.0 -
AlwaysLearnin wrote: »I think you're probably thinking of the same one that doughnutmachine refered to:
Ah, yes many thanks.
No more percentage fess/commissions, just reasonable hourly rates from now on, my backside!I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.
Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards