We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Devere parking releasing voice recordings and photos to the press.

2»

Comments

  • Hovite_2
    Hovite_2 Posts: 749 Forumite
    andy13 wrote: »
    It's perfectly legal to take video or images of anyone in public. The Data protection act does not apply. You can post the video and sound to the internet if you want to.

    Any photos and video taken in a public area yes - on private land no. Also voice recordings of a phone conversation are covered by the DPA.
  • Hovite wrote: »
    It better not be a Falmer Parish Councillor :mad:
    No, Westfield outside of Hastings. No yellow lines, no car parks, bliss. (well almost)
    I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.
  • Half_way
    Half_way Posts: 7,516 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Hovite wrote: »
    Any photos and video taken in a public area yes - on private land no. Also voice recordings of a phone conversation are covered by the DPA.


    And a car park, open to the public is a public area.
    As for the voice recordings, as long as the person isnt identified then there should be no problem - Avon and somerset police have a few inappropriate 999 calls online http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/units_and_departments/communications/999_calls/index.aspx?MasterPrint=1&
    From the Plain Language Commission:

    "The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"
  • Half_way wrote: »
    And a car park, open to the public is a public area.
    As for the voice recordings, as long as the person isnt identified then there should be no problem


    There is a subtle difference between being open to the public and a public space:

    A public space is defined as being under the control of either Central government or local government and is therefore freely enjoyed by the general population.

    A shop or other retail outfit for example cinema or restuarant is a private space where members of the public are invited to attend for the purposes of consumption of goods or services.

    The councillor's name was disclosed on the voice recording.

    *****************************************************

    Her comments regarding the number of parking spaces available for disabled users were very underhand.

    Just because there were several empty on the day and time she went, does not mean that at other times they are not used. The car park is huge 3,000 spaces with just 144 designated disabled so under the national guidelines.

    Castlepoint could be in real trouble if they tried to reduce disabled parking bays further by failing to meet the criteria for making reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act.

    Many large retail outlets such as this one will very even provide wheelchairs to enable customers with mobility problems to access their facilities - another reasonable adjustment made to meet their legal obligations.


    ****************************************************

    Maybe the councillor paid the charge - hoping to reclaim it on her expenses?!!


    :)
  • nigelbb
    nigelbb Posts: 3,819 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Half_way wrote: »
    And a car park, open to the public is a public area.
    As for the voice recordings, as long as the person isnt identified then there should be no problem - Avon and somerset police have a few inappropriate 999 calls online http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/units_and_departments/communications/999_calls/index.aspx?MasterPrint=1&

    Even if the person is identified in the recorded telephone conversation it's not a criminal offence but a tort that would require the offended party to sue. However I am not even sure that any offence was committed in this case as it is lawful for a business to record telephone conversations amongst other reasons "to provide evidence of a business transaction". I don't know whether the relevant law (Telecommunications (Lawful Business Practice)(Interception of Communications) Regulations 2000 ("LBP Regulations")) says anything about releasing that recording to 3rd-parties
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.