We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Panorama tonight: The Great House Price Bubble?
Comments
-
France builds more than 350.000 hes a uear the Uk less than 150.000
Nothing more need be said about the issue.
If you want good sozed homes at reasonable prices we need to up build rate to French levels.
Alternatively prices will go up lots to ration supply0 -
How do teh french manage to build 3 or 4 times as many houses pa as the British?
They don't seem to be concreting over all their farmland and villages.0 -
I wonder if Adam Shaw will venture out of the South East for his report?0
-
How do teh french manage to build 3 or 4 times as many houses pa as the British?
They don't seem to be concreting over all their farmland and villages.
Two big reasons
Development land is a lot cheaper because uk policy makes development land a lot more expensive (before the stupid chime in with...france is larger...well fekin Scotland is larger still on a per capita basis yet the French build 3-4x as mucj as the Scottish too)
Extra taxes are placed on uk builders which makes building less desirable
Also concreting over all farmland is a red herring. Inner London is about 0.13% of the area of the UK and houses 3.25 million. If another 0.13% of the land is dedicated to housing you could build the homes and other infrastructure for 3.25 million people (probably closer to 4 million as there is a lot of things in inner London whoch don't need to be duplicated)
So for each 4 million more people you only need dedicate about 0.13% of the land.0 -
posh*spice wrote: »That is seriously yuk and frankly just dumb - life is way too short for sharing bath water. I feel sick just at the thought of it...
So you don't have similar age kids that you bathe in the same water / when you were a child you never shared the bath water with a similarly aged sibling? May be you only bathed once a week so there was less environmental consequence of each using their own 300l of water?I think....0 -
So you don't have similar age kids that you bathe in the same water / when you were a child you never shared the bath water with a similarly aged sibling? May be you only bathed once a week so there was less environmental consequence of each using their own 300l of water?0
-
LOL.
Interesting to see people make up their minds on the programme before they have even watched it!
It will likely have extremes in it, yes. But hopefully there will be some middle, more common, ground which is can create an evaluation on.
I'll try and catch it!0 -
Loughton_Monkey wrote: »Gordon Brown completely eliminated Boom and bankrupted the economy. So your point is invalid.
Sorted your quote out for you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards