We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
35 hours a week for Jobsearch, not possible?
Options
Comments
-
sensibleadvice wrote: »Reason enough to apply and you'd be surprised how often this happens.
The last part sounds like long termer fleecing the system, just doing enough rather than job seeking.
no, the last part is just ensuring you dont get sanctioned. the problem with putting set targets on people is jobseeking becomes a target fulfilling exercise. it makes you spend more time worrying have i done enough rather than was that application i did good enough. people would rather focus on doing their best to get a job than having to focus on meeting targets.0 -
sensibleadvice wrote: »Perhaps, perhaps not. The point is you seem rather dismissive of what a potential employer may consider and write off any chance of success in the process.0
-
sensibleadvice wrote: »You can't make the distinction between "those who don't want work" and "all without exception"?0
-
What's feedback got to do with job applications and looking for work?
You have shipyard experience?
Baldrick: I have heard there's good money to be made down the docks. Doing favours for sailors.
Blackadder: What do you mean? Delivering messages, sewing on buttons?The truth may be out there, but the lies are inside your head. Terry Pratchett
http.thisisnotalink.cöm0 -
November5th wrote: »Well I signed on today (I sign off on Wednesday) and no discussion on the 40 hours (I just can't imagine how that would go). They were annoyed I did not give them access to my UJ account, just provided a screenshot.
When they asked why I did not give them access I said it was too insecure and you might force me to apply for very unsuitable/damaging jobs (CV Scrapers). She agreed that they would do that and we left it at stalemate.
It is now though a purely punitive system and is not about helping people into work at all, although I think they are still keen on shifting people onto self employed/working tax credits, judging by how empty this central London job centre is nowadays.0 -
It's simple; you're potentially worth a lot of money to the Work Program.We’ve had to remove your signature. Please check the Forum Rules if you’re unsure why it’s been removed and, if still unsure, email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
not if they tell you on day one 'we wont be able to help you' and leave you to do your own thing.
They may leave you to do your own thing but you can guarantee they'll stay in contact and should you get a job they will try their best to get the relevant info to put a claim in.
Depending on circumstances (disabilities, readiness for work, whatever) the last time I looked we're potentially worth £6000 - £14000 each to the WP. (or thereabouts)0 -
donnajunkie wrote: »yes i would be surprised if it happens often especially for most types of job.
no, the last part is just ensuring you dont get sanctioned. the problem with putting set targets on people is jobseeking becomes a target fulfilling exercise. it makes you spend more time worrying have i done enough rather than was that application i did good enough. people would rather focus on doing their best to get a job than having to focus on meeting targets.
This is true, jobcentre should be helpful not issuing draconian sanctions left right and centre. How does that help.:footie:0 -
They may leave you to do your own thing but you can guarantee they'll stay in contact and should you get a job they will try their best to get the relevant info to put a claim in.
Depending on circumstances (disabilities, readiness for work, whatever) the last time I looked we're potentially worth £6000 - £14000 each to the WP. (or thereabouts)We’ve had to remove your signature. Please check the Forum Rules if you’re unsure why it’s been removed and, if still unsure, email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards