Parking eye

Umkomaas

Thanks GD and C-m.

I've added some links as suggested by GD and edited (replaced) the version on here.

Holy_name

Guys_Dad wrote: »

Totally disagree. I have seen so many people helped on here and this check list is a great way to put them on the right track.

Do you seriously think that your 2 point suggestion is of the slightest help to newbies who haven't a clue as what to do?

In fact, I would suggest to Umkomaas to add the link to POPLA and BPA CoP web sites as "these might help" at the bottom of his excellent check list, not make any reductions.

Can you let me know the content I should include in the letter of appeal to Parking Eye please?

Holy_name

Umkomaas wrote: »

Thanks GD and C-m.

I've added some links as suggested by GD and edited (replaced) the version on here.

Can you let me know the content I should include in the letter of appeal to Parking Eye please?

Holy_name

Coupon-mad wrote: »

I like to think that was the case!

Maybe the car park numpty saw my pepipoo tattoos and ripped up their copies (only joking!).

Can you let me know the content I should include in the letter of appeal to Parking Eye please?

Guys_Dad

The driver was waiting for a passenger from the IOW ferry. Driver parked in a bay and was not aware of restrictions on parking. As keeper, I must conclude that there must have been some inadequacy in the signage or other parking arrangements.

As the registered keeper I ask you to cancel this charge which must be far greater than any genuine pretty estimate of loss you may have incurred. If you feel unable to agree then please send a POPLA code so that I can appeal to the independent adjudicator.

That should get you the POPLA ode.

Umkomaas

I can't see Computersaysno rushing to help out here!

But there again, let's not over complicate things!

1. Appeal to PPC [and lose]

2. Appeal to POPLA [and win]

That's all there is to it.

zzzLazyDaisy

Guys_Dad wrote: »

As the registered keeper I ask you to cancel this charge which must be far greater than any genuine pretty estimate of loss you may have incurred.

Damn that predictive text!

OP: what our good friend, Guy's Dad, meant to say was 'genuine pre-estimate of loss'

Computersaysno

Holy_name wrote: »

Can you let me know the content I should include in the letter of appeal to Parking Eye please?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Guys_Dad

zzzLazyDaisy wrote: »

Damn that predictive text!

OP: what our good friend, Guy's Dad, meant to say was 'genuine pre-estimate of loss'

Nexus 7 plus SwiftKey app plus bad proof reading plus aged eyesight all contribute to numerous typos that regulars kindly correct for me.

Best read any posts from me that were written between 10am - 10pm when on my PC. outside these hours, expect the occasional gibberish!

Coupon-mad

Holy_name wrote: »

Can you let me know the content I should include in the letter of appeal to Parking Eye please?

You don't have to send a letter, don't waste time on it. Just do an online appeal saying this is land covered by Port Authority Byelaws so their PCN is misleading as it mentions POFA 2012 and registered keeper liability. No such liability applies on land covered by statutory byelaws as it is not 'relevant land' under POFA 2012. And the registered keeper will not be divulging the driver's details but would be happy to appeal at POPLA stage, where the keeper will also state that this charge is not a 'genuine pre-estimate of loss'. So you suggest PE cancels the charge since they have no case to pursue it.

Tick the box to say you are the registered keeper.

DO NOT IMPLY WHO WAS DRIVING. OBVIOUSLY!

I suggest you change your first post above to 'the driver' or 'we' when talking about the incident. PE read this forum; they pay someone to do so...