We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
BOE: "Not our job to regulate house prices"
Comments
-
-
I believe we have been experiencing a recession and periods of very low growth plus a massive increase in debt due the the banking crisis.
I think this has affected the level of infrastructure spending.
It has indeed affected infrastructure spending but it often lagged, if it occurred at all, before those events."If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....
"big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham0 -
I'm losing the plot here0
-
Yes to rectify years of under spending. Plenty of new building with a lack of road, public transport, school or doctor spending where I am.
Same here.
The Local Development Plan is a shambles and has been out of date for some time. The developers are having a field day shooting of disproportionate development applications one after the other. The council are in continuous fire fight mode.
It has been that way for several years.
The market knows best so I am sure it will all work out."If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....
"big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham0 -
"If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....
"big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham0 -
leveller2911 wrote: »Because some HA houses were/are built with grants you think ALL HA houses must be the same. You are very ignorant to how it actually works and seem to be rather bitter towards HA tenants ,the majority of whom are not spongers, they work hard,contribute to society and many pay their way in life.
Your HA wouldn't function without taxpayer handouts. I read the accounts - bet that's more than you've done. The biggest risk they identify to their business model is that these handouts are reduced due to changes in policy.
No bitterness or comment about how hard people are working - just suggesting that this model is unlikely to be the most efficient use of taxpayers capital and it can give a false sense of people paying their way when the reality is that they aren't.leveller2911 wrote: »Our house is a typical HA house in a semi rural location.It was built in 1993, it was built on land donated by the local Council who stipulated that the houses must be occupied by local people. The HA gained mortgages to build the houses. The mortgages were paid off about 5 years ago and now the majority of the rent we pay is "profit" for the HA.
The council didn't donate the land - it was donated by the taxpayer - another subsidy. The profit of the HA is irrelevant - how did the taxpayer benefit from the donation of land, building grants and ongoing funding?leveller2911 wrote: »We pay a "fair " rent worked out by Government , its private housing tenants I feel sorry for who are being [STRIKE] fleeced [/STRIKE]charged high rents by private landlords who want to maximise profit and they can't see beyond the £ at the harm they are doing to Society as a whole. You concentrate on the term "subsidised" with HA tenants but I suspect a fair percentage of private sector landlords would go bust tomorrow if housing benefit was withdrawn, all those landlords who take housing benefit tenants are being subsidised by the taxpayer , but you never seem to moan about that. Is it because you see landlords as being somehow superior?.
I'm not singling out HA's here - whilst a glance at their accounts show that the business model collapses without taxpayer support the same will go for BTL's renting to people in receipt of HB.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards