The Everlasting Loveliness (that) Is The Elite

PetuliaGristle

FloFlo wrote: »

I think I'll take a break from here for a while, and I'd apreciate it if the Tesco c&cs were called something else, I don't care if people check back and name it after the real original finder or just name it something else but it will mean I won't have to close my account on here.

Evening all.

Flo, I understand your feelings, I would be :eek: in your position, I hope there's a way you can stay on Mse (((hugs))) going back to catching up/lurking.

Dopey_Sleepy_Grumpy

frequent wrote: »

Indeed, the software is linked to the PO system, so anything untoward should flag, which is where people circumventing the system comes into it, number 41 A, B , C etc. ...

I'm not going to say any more on this subject. I was not trying to get at you FQ. I genuinely don't understand

thick_tom

TrulyMadly wrote: »

I love antediluvian and enigmatic

I hate moist:)

i adore moist :j :beer: :cool: :T

DeeDee74

henrik777 wrote: »

I might have been first victim this time. No need for sympathy, it's wasted on me because i didn't even raise an eyebrow. If it makes him happy let him be i for one, certainly couldn't give a monkeys.

Glad it don't bother you doesn't make it rite though.

frequent

Dopey_Sleepy_Grumpy wrote: »

I'm not going to say any more on this subject. I was not trying to get at you FQ. I genuinely don't understand

Well yeah I know that DSG, I didn't take it as you were.

Unlike some other members :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

fairclaire

Frequent I have no opinion one way or the other on what you or anyone else has said. Each to their own and all that. Im more than happy with where I stand with regards to fraud.....that is what's likely to land me up in court and what's not. But others might well not be and I hate the thought of people possibly being worried through reading information that is wrong. Not up for debate.....just wrong in fact.

You mentioned Obtaining pecuniary advantage earlier. This charge no longer exists, it was repealed by the fraud act in 2007 and unless an offence was committed before that date, no person can be charged with it. You need to look at the Fraud Act 2006 for up to date information.

I'm not being a smart as. Like I said, there may be people here who could be worried by your posts unnecessarily and that isn't fair

I have my own views and experience on fraud, which I don't wish to air here. Each person must make up their own minds about what they choose to do. They can only do that with the correct information.

Mrs_stinkface

I've not read back completely so I'm sure I've missed a lot of the posts last night. Floflo, please reconsider. I find your posts really helpful and your humour would defo be missed here. This is your home, please stay. X

Kadiekaismummi- congrats on the new job hun x

nerfdad

Wheres_My_Cashback wrote: »

I love moist :rotfl:

thick_tom wrote: »

down girls down!!!!


:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Your the man tom:T:T:T

76rosie

frequent wrote: »

Stands corrected, its still fraud anyway you dress it :beer:

And your right, they should be worried.

Crime is socially constructed:rotfl::rotfl:

Tweets_2

You do love bleating on about your "fan club turning on you" quite a bit. There's a name for someone who gets a kick out of provoking people on internet forums so I'll do with you what I do with the other one who's pestering me at the moment.