We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
vinci taken to court
hammer68
Posts: 147 Forumite
anybody seen the piece in todays sunday mirror , driver issued ticket , no appeals ref given so he sued them and is now £800 better off
happy days
happy days
0
Comments
-
Can you post the link plsProud to be a member of the Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Gang.:D:T0
-
Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Just read and something doesn't quite add up for me....
I think we are missing quite a bit and it's not a land mark case. Bad reporting yet again.
Good though!, just have to get them to pay up !!Proud to be a member of the Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Gang.:D:T0 -
Fantastic - one in the eye for these scammers! - Many more to follow on other legal precedents I hope!0
-
kirkbyinfurnesslad wrote: »Just read and something doesn't quite add up for me....
I think we are missing quite a bit and it's not a land mark case. Bad reporting yet again.
Breach of any BPA CoP may lead to further cases - giving info regarding how to appeal is cited under one of their codes.0 -
Good result, but if this sets up a new trend many pakring companies will just phoenix into something else ( possibly using the TCP/smart parking marker pen method)
If anything is to be done then instead of targeting the parking companies, the principal should be in the firing line, in otherwords whoever lets these Parasitic Parking Companies onto their land.From the Plain Language Commission:
"The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"0 -
Of course, being just a county court case, it doesn't set any precedent.What part of "A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo" don't you understand?0
-
trisontana wrote: »Of course, being just a county court case, it doesn't set any precedent.
Very true! - Needs to go much higher up the chain. Still any loss for PPC is a good loss!0 -
It's ironic that PPC's tend to quote the odd case that has been won by them in an attempt to frighten people into paying up.What part of "A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo" don't you understand?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards