We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Stocks and shares ISAs

2»

Comments

  • Archi_Bald
    Archi_Bald Posts: 9,681 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Brokers are to do with investing. MSE has nothing to do with investing.
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 19,247 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 9 October 2013 at 12:16PM
    Archi_Bald wrote: »
    Brokers are to do with investing. MSE has nothing to do with investing.


    That's not strictly true. There are lots of forum posts about investing and lots of people here with lots of investment experience that are able to answer newbie type questions.
    scomjak wrote: »
    INVESTORS using one of Britain’s most successful fund supermarkets may be paying thousands of pounds more in charges than those at smaller rivals.
    However, analysis by candidmoney.com, the personal finance website, shows that Hargreaves customers are losing out.
    .

    Rather a sensationalist and misleading headline there. Bearing in mind the commission payments of 0.5% on investments in order to be "paying thousands" you'd need to have over £200,000 of investments and that would be if you paid the entire commission with no rebate. As a majority of people have no savings at all I'd imagine the percentage with over £200,000 as investments would be very small indeed.

    While HL are not the cheapest they are still cheaper than going direct. What might have been a more appropriate story would be showing how much investors going direct to fund houses are being ripped off. Paying full initial charges and full annual commission when there is no IFA and the fund house therefore pockets the total. In those situations you would lose at least 5% of your investment and 0.5% per year paying for no service at all.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.