My dog bled to death 2 hours after leaving veterinary practice

WTFH

hachette wrote: »

I did look at their audited accounts years ago very closely with this issue I have managed to move on.
Do you agree that they have by now over 70 million of unused funds or not? Because that is a fact.

No, I 100% disagree! because it is a lie.

You cannot prove it, you have been asked to, but you constantly refuse to.

You are either deluded or a liar. Which one is it?

ILW

hachette wrote: »

My prejudice against Dogs Trust is based on more that that. 8 years ago a very small charity (they did not have much funds) had a very sick dog that they have looked after for over 1 year. The dog needed
operation on his legs that would cost £5000. The charity did not have it. I have approached Dogs Trust (Chris Laurence) asking if they could pay for this (as they so well in funds) Do you think they did? No . They have offered £100 towards the op.
There are some rules regarding the unused funds set by the charity commission I cannot remember the exact wording but it did mention something about helping other charities that do not have enough funds.

Any charity that spent £5000 on one dog would be falling down in its duties. There would be much better uses for that type of cash.

WTFH

And another irrefutable fact...
8 years ago the highest paid employee of the Dogs Trust was paid between £80,001 and £90,000.

If you went to someone earning that much and told them you knew they earned £200,000 with the attitude you've shown here, I'm not surprised if they weren't interested in helping you, you haven't a clue what you're talking about!

imoneyop

WTFH wrote: »

You are either deluded or a liar. Which one is it?

I'd say she is both. I'm guessing she has both numeracy and language problems as she doesn't seem able to understand numbers or words very well.

hachette

gb12345 wrote: »

You have still failed to provide evidence to back up the claims that you make about the salaries paid to Dogs Trusts executives - so how can we believe anything you say? I'm beginning to wonder if this whole thread is a web of lies and fantasy.

Yes you said this before. Look, I did not set out to talk about charities. Somebody said I should give money to the dog charity to help me put closure to my dog's death so I said what I have learned years ago. I had all the stuff in regard to Dogs Trust stored in my garage for long time but there was no point any more to keep it. I do not need to prove anything. Go on the charity gov site make your own calculations.

hachette

gb12345 wrote: »

Still not backing up your claims with any solid evidence?

Still here??

gb12345

hachette wrote: »

Yes you said this before. Look, I did not set out to talk about charities. Somebody said I should give money to the dog charity to help me put closure to my dog's death so I said what I have learned years ago. I had all the stuff in regard to Dogs Trust stored in my garage for long time but there was no point any more to keep it. I do not need to prove anything. Go on the charity gov site make your own calculations.

I don-t need to make "calculations", because I know the I know the salary ranges of the executives of Dogs Trust for each of the last 7 years (as it appears do the majority of posters on here - who were bright enough to find the correct figures).

You stated as a fact that Dogs Trust were paying their top staff between 150,000 and 200,000 8 years ago - that has been proven to be a blatant lie.

Do you admit that you are just making numbers up and posting the first figure that comes into your head, because every number you come up with is wrong.

hachette

halibut2209 wrote: »

Good to see irony is alive and well.

Well there are some things that even I can get over. Yes irony is alive.:j

hachette

gb12345 wrote: »

I don-t need to make "calculations", because I know the I know the salary ranges of the executives of Dogs Trust for each of the last 7 years (as it appears do the majority of posters on here - who were bright enough to find the correct figures).

You stated as a fact that Dogs Trust were paying their top staff between 150,000 and 200,000 8 years ago - that has been proven to be a blatant lie.

Do you admit that you are just making numbers up and posting the first figure that comes into your head, because every number you come up with is wrong.

No. At the time when I have research them the top Dogs Trust members were paid 150-200,000.

WTFH

hachette wrote: »

Well there are some things that even I can get over. Yes irony is alive.:j

Unfortunately, providing proof to back up claims seems to be something you're not interested in.

You can't handle the truth.