My dog bled to death 2 hours after leaving veterinary practice

WTFH

gb12345 wrote: »

It took me 1 minute to find Dogs Trusts accounts for last year (which may or may not prove your allegations) - so why were you not willing to provide a link - probably because you know that it will show you to be a fantacist.

Likewise, in fact it was one of the first hits when I searched. I was surprised how much there was, but also how it was earmarked for work.
A charity can't rely on this year's donations to pay this year's bills or ongoing purchases.

As for Chris Laurence (notice the spelling of his name), he retired from the role as veterinary directory of the Dogs Trust in 2011. Since then Paula Boyden has been fulfilling that role.

earthstorm

peachyprice wrote: »

Seventy thousand million, wow you're really stating for a fact that Dogs trust has £70 Billion? I doubt it very much.

i think its all BS to draw attention away from the OPs case that she has no chance of winning as she seems to be changing stories.

Also many have asked from proof of this £70 Billion the Dogs Trust has that makes them struggle on a day to day basis to feed the dogs then have waiting for new homes, but yet no proof given

WTFH

Just to clear something up, the audited accounts for the Dogs Trust for 2012 show that on 31/12/12 they had £4,919,000 cash in the bank and in hand, which was down £607,000 on the start of the year.

I realise that those figures were only by BDO LLP, the authorised auditors, so they are probably not as accurate as hachette's facts.

gb12345

WTFH wrote: »

Just to clear something up, the audited accounts for the Dogs Trust for 2012 show that on 31/12/12 they had £4,919,000 cash in the bank and in hand, which was down £607,000 on the start of the year.

I realise that those figures were only by BDO LLP, the authorised auditors, so they are probably not as accurate as hachette's facts.

I guess the question is then where has the missing £69 billion gone - you can buy a hell of a lot of Pal for that money.:D

WTFH

That's probably Christopher Lawerence's salary, since there's no record of him working for the Dogs Trust, he must be an undercover vet.

paddyrg

£72M income, spending £65M, £7M retained for future use.

Assets held (eg facilities) for revenue and/or use. This is all completely normal.

WTFH

hachette wrote: »

Did you know that Dog Trust has over 70 million of unused funds? They pay top staff over 200,000 per year to the big bosses like Christopher Lawrence the vet.

hachette wrote: »

Check it out yourself. 70.000 million that was about 6 years ago. God know how much money they got now? Mr Lawrence getting most of it. Is for walking the dogs?

hachette wrote: »

Check out Dog Trust. £70 million of unused funds . Why don't we ask Mr Lawrence abut it?

hachette wrote: »

You do not think that 70,000 million that Dogs Trust have is true?
It is true. What do you think about that?

paddyrg wrote: »

£72M income, spending £65M, £7M retained for future use.
Assets held (eg facilities) for revenue and/or use. This is all completely normal.

There's a slight difference between £70M of "unused funds" and £72M of income. I wonder will hachette accept that fact?

ILW

paddyrg wrote: »

£72M income, spending £65M, £7M retained for future use.

Assets held (eg facilities) for revenue and/or use. This is all completely normal.

Normal is not a word I would associate with much of this thread.

earthstorm

WTFH wrote: »

That's probably Christopher Lawerence's salary, since there's no record of him working for the Dogs Trust, he must be an undercover vet.

I wonder what an an American DJ and producer is doing with 70 Billion of Dog Trust Funds

https://www.google.co.uk/#q=christopher+lawrence

Looks likes its going to be one hell of a Christmas Party 70 Billion for a DJ

hachette

What I meant was 70 million. Now that was a mistake that I feel you should get over.