We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Help to Buy Part 2 - OPENING WITHIN DAYS

1235

Comments

  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,340 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Tancred wrote: »
    The problem is that 10% of the value of a house can be a huge sum these days. Not a big issue in place like the north, Scotland etc but in the south-east 10% can be £30k even for a modest house. This isn't small change.
    But this is irrelevant. The person who posted this has wrongly assumed there's an equity loan when there isn't.

    HTB - MG is only about the Government giving the lender a guarantee over the top 15% if the property is repossessed.

    The lender is paying for that guarantee.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • jamie11
    jamie11 Posts: 4,436 Forumite
    kingstreet wrote: »
    The lender is paying for that guarantee.

    I disagree Kingstreet, ultimately it will be the buyer that pays.
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,340 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    In the context in which it is intended, the point I'm trying to make is that it will not cost the Government anything.

    I'm not particularly concerned who it is costing as long as it isn't costing the taxpayer, as I'm arguing against the inference that the taxpayer is picking up the cost of this, when it isn't (yet, if at all).

    On your substantive issue, yes, the borrower will pay for it, just as it pays the interest, the fees and everything else which goes into the pricing of a mortgage product.

    On the very similar NewBuy, the purchaser is paying more for a property for the privilege of the builder paying 3% of that price into the indemnity fund.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • Tancred
    Tancred Posts: 1,424 Forumite
    kingstreet wrote: »
    But this is irrelevant. The person who posted this has wrongly assumed there's an equity loan when there isn't.

    HTB - MG is only about the Government giving the lender a guarantee over the top 15% if the property is repossessed.

    The lender is paying for that guarantee.

    So it's therefore more useful for the lender than it is for the borrower. The only advantage I can see for the borrower is that he doesn't have to pay back the government backed part of the loan for five years.
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,340 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    There is no Government backed part of the loan to repay. The borrower gets a single, first charge mortgage for 95% of the price of the property

    All the Government is doing is guaranteeing to reimburse the lender the top 15% of the mortgage amount, from 80% upto 95%, if the property is repossessed.

    The borrower still faces the same bill, as he will still be expected to cover any shortfall.

    It's the same as the old mortgage indemnity insurance scheme, which protected the lender in the vent of repossession and the insurer used its subrogation rights to reclaim any payment to the lender back from the borrower.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • sulphate
    sulphate Posts: 1,235 Forumite
    I think there is some confusion here: there are 2 schemes in Help to Buy - equity loan on new builds and mortgage guarantee.

    The equity loan part has been available since April and does require a loan from the government which is interest free for 5 years. The mortgage guarantee part is the one they are talking about in the news atm.

    I'm against the equity loan part, I don't see how someone who can only afford to save up a 5% deposit will be able to afford to pay back the loan.
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,340 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    sulphate wrote: »
    I think there is some confusion here: there are 2 schemes in Help to Buy - equity loan on new builds and mortgage guarantee
    Quite.

    I have been waging a one-man battle to explain that HTB - MG is different and there is no equity loan.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • Sorry in advance for my ignorance on these matters...

    I'm a first time buyer currently in the middle of purchasing a property (Just got the survey back, all is well!). It's a £215k property and I've secured a mortgage at 4.1% with a deposit of £25k down. With these new developments, does anyone think it would be possible for me to go back to my mortgage broker and get a better deal by me putting down 10%, and the government putting in another 10%, and then I'd get a better rate or some such?

    I'm really far too uninformed, so if anyone could shed some light on this matter it would be much appreciated!
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,340 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    mrmacca wrote: »
    Sorry in advance for my ignorance on these matters...

    I'm a first time buyer currently in the middle of purchasing a property (Just got the survey back, all is well!). It's a £215k property and I've secured a mortgage at 4.1% with a deposit of £25k down. With these new developments, does anyone think it would be possible for me to go back to my mortgage broker and get a better deal by me putting down 10%, and the government putting in another 10%, and then I'd get a better rate or some such?

    I'm really far too uninformed, so if anyone could shed some light on this matter it would be much appreciated!
    No. That is not the way the scheme works if this is a second-hand property. The Government is not going to put another 10% down.

    You will not get a better rate.

    You are doing the right thing. Carry on.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • kingstreet wrote: »
    No. That is not the way the scheme works if this is a second-hand property. The Government is not going to put another 10% down.

    You will not get a better rate.

    You are doing the right thing. Carry on.

    Thanks for the reassurance!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.