We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
S21 Notice to force paying renewal fees?
browneyedbazzi
Posts: 3,405 Forumite
We've received a S21 Notice from our letting agent - the landlord doesn't actually want possession of the property but the agent routinely serves S21 notices on tenants so that you are forced to either leave or renew the tenancy, including paying their astronomical fees for the contract and agreeing to stay a further 12 months.
We're hoping to buy a house in the near future (deposit etc all sorted, just need to find the right place!) so we would much prefer to go onto a periodic tenancy as that will offer a lot more flexibility (and avoid all the fees).
Is what the letting agent doing acceptable and do we have to go along with it, or do we have other options?
(our deposit was correctly protected and I believe we received the correct information within the required timescale)
We're hoping to buy a house in the near future (deposit etc all sorted, just need to find the right place!) so we would much prefer to go onto a periodic tenancy as that will offer a lot more flexibility (and avoid all the fees).
Is what the letting agent doing acceptable and do we have to go along with it, or do we have other options?
(our deposit was correctly protected and I believe we received the correct information within the required timescale)
Common sense?...There's nothing common about sense!
0
Comments
-
Acceptable? That is a matter of opinion, but perfectly legal. Anyway, have you asked your landlord what s/he thinks?
In your situation, I think I would ignore it and continue to pay the rent while not signing a new contract. The landlord could then begin the long and expensive process of getting a court to order you to leave, but might prefer to allow you to remain on a periodic tenancy and so avoid the hassle and expense.0 -
browneyedbazzi wrote: »Is what the letting agent doing acceptable and do we have to go along with it, or do we have other options?
Legally yes, morally... probably not.
Your options are fairly straight forward:
1. You're a tenant of the landlord, the agency is just a middleman, speak to your landlord directly and explain that you can't afford the fees and will be forced to leave if you have to pay them. The landlord will have no reason to evict you -- as he sees nothing of the fees -- and will not want to suffer from the tenancy void.
2. Refuse to pay and automatically switch to a periodic tenancy. The letting agent will incur costs when advertising and finding new tenants, they may well be relying on your lack of knowledge of the process and hoping that you just pay up. If you call their bluff they may well realise there's no value for them in fighting you (by evicting (and they'd need the landlords permission for this)) and let you stay.
If you do refuse to pay they will still have to give you proper notice for you to leave and they will have to go through the courts to get an eviction which will take more than a month, if you have a fall back plan (eg: find a new place to stay) this might not hit you as hard, although moving does cost money.0 -
From this I assume you are in communication with the landlord? Talk to him! He is the boss; the agents work for him!browneyedbazzi wrote: »....- the landlord doesn't actually want possession of the property but
All he needs do is write a letter to his agents, instructing them to take no action on the expiry of the S21, and to allow you to stay on a Statutory Periodic Tenancy.
Your tenancy agreement is not with the agents, it is with the landlord, so HE should be deciding whether to evict you or not.0 -
The landlord lives abroad so isn't easy to get in touch with - we have a postal address but no phone/email details and have never had any direct communication with him. I think I'll put a letter in the post and see what he says - I expect he'll be happy for us to stay as long as the rent is paid and he won't want the expense of the court process etc
If the letting agent does go ahead with going to court for a possession order, is that at their/the landlord's expense or would we end up having to pay their costs??Common sense?...There's nothing common about sense!0 -
browneyedbazzi wrote: »The landlord lives abroad so isn't easy to get in touch with - we have a postal address but no phone/email details and have never had any direct communication with him. I think I'll put a letter in the post and see what he says - I expect he'll be happy for us to stay as long as the rent is paid and he won't want the expense of the court process etc
If the letting agent does go ahead with going to court for a possession order, is that at their/the landlord's expense or would we end up having to pay their costs??
See if you can find other contact details for your landlord -- Google is your friend. Or you could be sneaky; think of a complicated question, tell the agent that you need to discuss it with him directly and see if they give the number.
As for costs: the agent (ultimately the landlord) would need to pay them up-front. At the end of the case the judge has discretion as to whether to order you to pay part or all of the costs.0 -
The agent cannot unilaterally go to court for possession of the property, the LL must be on board with such action. Just depends what the LA are telling him.
But absolutely not, do not leave at the end of s.210 -
This may present a problem then. Manyoverseas landlords(especially if not British nationals) simply delegate the entire tenancy management to their agent.browneyedbazzi wrote: »The landlord lives abroad so isn't easy to get in touch with - we have a postal address but no phone/email details and have never had any direct communication with him. I think I'll put a letter in the post and see what he says - I expect he'll be happy for us to stay as long as the rent is paid and he won't want the expense of the court process etc
If the letting agent does go ahead with going to court for a possession order, is that at their/the landlord's expense or would we end up having to pay their costs??
They may not wish to be involved at all. They may not understand the tenancy process. They may not wish to interfere with the agent's decisions.
Whilst I think this is often foolhardy, given may agents' attitude to profit opportunities, it is understandable.
If the LL has delegated total control to the agent via their contract, the agent can issue a S21 (on the LL's behalf), and may even have the authority to instruct a solicitor, at the LL's expense of course, to take the necessary court action.
However, hopefully your LL will be amenable to granting you more flexibility, and will instruct his agent accordingly if you write to him.
Where court action is concerned, the court may or may not well award costs to the LL, which you would then have to pay.0 -
Hi stilbonjyoti. Welcome.stilbonjyoti wrote: »Further and very important, within 14 days the landlord must serve a notice on the ... that at least three months should be allowed before new legislation comes into force. ... to evict the tenant using the Section 21 procedure i.e
Could you explain your post....?0 -
Spammer ... getting post count up ... see some of the other threads ...0
-
browneyedbazzi, I am in the same situation as you and my landlord also seemingly wants nothing to do with me or their property. The advice I received on this forum, after telling the agent I had no intention of renewing the agreement or moving out, was basically just ignore the agent and continue paying rent as normal, which I have done since. They've tried to call me a couple of times and left messages - at first they said they needed to know what I wanted to do before their deadline, despite the fact I'd already told them, but the most recent one sounded pretty desperate, asking for "a chat". Hopefully they'll leave me alone from here on in.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards