We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Underfloor heating installed on a suspended timber floor
Comments
-
We are in the same situation, newish build house and retrofitting UFH to 25sqm. Nu heat low pro claim a 120w/ms2 whilst polypipe claim only 79w/ms2 despite using bigger pipes and the pipe sits into fibreboard (insulation added?) instead of the screed of nu heat. Nu heat has 10mm pipes, polypipe is 12mm.
I just want the best performance, but the above logic I'm struggling to understand?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards