📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

advice on bicycle and car accident

Options
A friend had an accident whilst on his bicycle, he was hit during march this year by a driver swerving to avoid slush in the road. Whilst he was not injured the bike had to be scrapped. It was reported to the police and the driver also visited them to explain what happened and it was dropped.
Last month his mother, as he was 17 at the time, received a letter from his insurance company claiming for damage to a wing mirror £1400. Today the police have sent a letter saying that they weren't going to prosecute anybody and it was going to be filed away.
Does anybody know what to do about the claim for money. As it was a bicycle there is no insurance on it nor was he at fault in the first place.

Thanks.
«1345

Comments

  • Idiophreak
    Idiophreak Posts: 12,024 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Who paid for the damage to the bike in the first place?
  • spacey2012
    spacey2012 Posts: 5,836 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Contact a solicitor and file a claim, he does not need to be physically injured, he can claim for physiological effect and damage to his clothing and Bike.
    The stupid letter is all the proof a solicitor will need.
    Be happy...;)
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Tell the insurance co. that the driver was liable, not your son.
  • His insurance company have already paid him the cost of damages so are trying to recover the money now from his mom. There wasn't a claim for the bike filed it was just scrapped. The insurance company have said if they get a witness they will drop the claims, it looks as though they will try and do anything for the money. His family are on benefits so can't afford to pay for solicitor or the claim.
  • tasticz
    tasticz Posts: 774 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    they paid out because either it was a comprehensive insurance or the cyclist isn't disputing that the car driver is at fault.

    was the cyclist injured? if so its its time to make a claim now via no win no fee

    i don't understand why these cyclists don't get a insurance like us car drivers it only costs them like £20-£30 a year or like £2 a month and can save a lot of hassle if anything happens
  • iammumtoone
    iammumtoone Posts: 6,377 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    tasticz wrote: »

    i don't understand why these cyclists don't get a insurance like us car drivers it only costs them like £20-£30 a year or like £2 a month and can save a lot of hassle if anything happens

    I am not a regular cyclist (just a fair weather one :D) and will sometimes cycle into town to save on parking costs. However if I was to pay insurance it would certainly be cheaper to drive. To be honest it would never occur to me to get insurance what damage would I be able to do on a bike? I would certainly come worse off.

    Is the police report able to help did the driver admit liability at the time to the police?
  • spacey2012
    spacey2012 Posts: 5,836 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    A Conditional fee solicitor might not have put a claim in on behalf of the boy due to lack of evidence, but who ever sent this letter must only have half a brain.
    It is as good as a full admission the driver collided with the bike.

    I would get the phone book out, the lad has in the region of 3-5K waiting for him.
    Be happy...;)
  • arcon5
    arcon5 Posts: 14,099 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    So a car hit the cyclist, the cars insurers paid for the cyclists damaged bike, now the car insurer wants you to pay for the wing mirror (and other costs based on the amount request).

    WOW what a cheek!
  • Strider590
    Strider590 Posts: 11,874 Forumite
    Sounds like the insurance company are thinking because the driver wasn't prosecuted, he must be innocent.

    All part of a much bigger problem, cyclists being the minority always get the blame and schemes to help cyclist safety are often put in place from a drivers perspective.
    “I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.”

    <><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/
  • rs65
    rs65 Posts: 5,682 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    bailey23 wrote: »
    As it was a bicycle there is no insurance on it nor was he at fault in the first place.
    The cyclist (or his parents) may have liability cover under their home insurance.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.