We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Wife suing for aliment ....how much will she get?

1235»

Comments

  • newcook
    newcook Posts: 5,001 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Gigglepig wrote: »
    if she earns double (300 a week) well, nursery alone would cost more than half of that...? .

    OP said she earns double of what he used to - not what he earns now
  • StuC75
    StuC75 Posts: 2,065 Forumite
    Or that as they have split he doesnt know of what arrangements she may be making to mitigate her costs..
    duchy wrote: »
    I noticed OP used the past tense ...that she earned (past tense) double.....not that she earns this now -so could refer to before the split or even before the child was born.
  • Thumper7
    Thumper7 Posts: 272 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    duchy wrote: »
    Why do you feel the business should be regarded as seperate to any other marital asset ? It is usual that all assets are considered jointly-are there special circumstances that make the business different to any other asset within the marriage ?


    No the business will not be an asset of the marriage. Under Scots Law only assets accrued during the marriage and up to the date of separation (known as the Relevant Date) are taken into account.
    Smile, you are beautiful:)
  • MonkeyLoo
    MonkeyLoo Posts: 41 Forumite
    Thanks everyone. That was an interesting string of postings, some useful information.
    Apologies to the men haters for getting them wound up! They know who they are.........

    Were not all the same
  • Thegirl
    Thegirl Posts: 143 Forumite
    I would recommend posing the question on wikivorce, they have a lot of people well versed in Scottish law and the implications.

    On the face of it, if it's a new company and that is what you are earning, then that is what you are earning. That is what it would have to be calculated on. You cannot agree to something which you cannot afford.

    Perhaps some mediation might help her get some more realistic views on the sums likely to be agreed upon....
    This might just be an opening shot from a solicitor starting the negotiation high. Just a thought.

    Good luck with it all.
    If I cut you out of my life I can guarantee you handed me the scissors
  • cazziebo
    cazziebo Posts: 3,209 Forumite
    duchy wrote: »
    He's also implying his business is capable of providing him with a proper wage and he's deliberately drawing less than previously to play the system.

    That's not necessarily true. I'm self employed and only pay myself the minimum. That's because I don't know what I'll earn next month the month after, or the month after that. I wouldn't know for sure until the year is up what my "surplus" might be.

    I'd be awfy worried if someone based a financial commitment on one of my best months!
  • itsanne wrote: »
    So you are actually receiving more than that but don't want to let on?

    Money you secretly make will affect your childs's wellbeing.

    You are responsible for your child, end of.

    :mad:

    It's clear that as the owner of a ltd company, you can choose to let funds build up in the business, and not take them as dividend, or pay more into a pension, and reduce your declared income, but i would have thought that the value of the business and the pension would have to be declared at the point of the divorce, so any value hidden, would only need a reasonably competent auditor to find it and add it to the divorce figures.
    :rotfl:So short term gain for long term loss:rotfl:
  • Treevo
    Treevo Posts: 1,937 Forumite
    Paying yourself a small regular amount, paying as much as possible into a pension and taking any excess as dividends twice a year is just good business sense.
  • MonkeyLoo
    MonkeyLoo Posts: 41 Forumite
    It's clear that as the owner of a ltd company, you can choose to let funds build up in the business, and not take them as dividend, or pay more into a pension, and reduce your declared income, but i would have thought that the value of the business and the pension would have to be declared at the point of the divorce, so any value hidden, would only need a reasonably competent auditor to find it and add it to the divorce figures.
    :rotfl:So short term gain for long term loss:rotfl:


    That wouldn't be the case as the business was setup AFTER the separation date
  • I live in scotland and had never heard of this.... My ex got away with out supporting his child never mind me !

    I always feel it's a bit, I dunno, old school, a woman expecting a man she's no longer with to still support her financially.....his children..yes...but not the ex
    Its all mind over matter. I don't mind and you don't matter:rotfl:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.