We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Conservatory being built - whose fence is it?

124»

Comments

  • cyclonebri1
    cyclonebri1 Posts: 12,827 Forumite
    DTDfanBoy wrote: »
    That would be partially possible, if you wanted to you could build it in a manner which would still allow it to be classed as a conservatory, but the roof and walls would have to comply with building regs ;) so I can't see any real reason someone would want to take that approach

    But he didn't say that, he suggested that if no glazing spec was in existance, then it could be a solid brick/block construction.

    That would then be a garden store, and be limited to the same physical size restraints as a conservatory would?

    It's a question, I'm at the limits of my knowledge of such stuff, but something else comes to mind if planning is to be avoided.

    The OP has to bear in mind the total added areas of extension from the original footprint, not just this latest addition.

    Or I could be talking total bollax as I sometimes do, ;);)
    I like the thanks button, but ,please, an I agree button.

    Will the grammar and spelling police respect I do make grammatical errors, and have carp spelling, no need to remind me.;)

    Always expect the unexpected:eek:and then you won't be dissapointed
  • DTDfanBoy
    DTDfanBoy Posts: 1,704 Forumite
    But he didn't say that, he suggested that if no glazing spec was in existance, then it could be a solid brick/block construction.

    That would then be a garden store, and be limited to the same physical size restraints as a conservatory would?

    It's a question, I'm at the limits of my knowledge of such stuff, but something else comes to mind if planning is to be avoided.

    The OP has to bear in mind the total added areas of extension from the original footprint, not just this latest addition.

    Or I could be talking total bollax as I sometimes do, ;);)

    If you wanted to there's nothing to stop you removing the roof and sides from your conservatory and blocking the whole lot up, the walls and roof would have to meet building regs, but the room as a whole wouldn't, providing you have other means of escape from your house I don't see how they can even ask that you keep a door into the garden :eek:

    The change in regs has come about to enable people to upgrade their conservatories into more usable spaces, more insulation = less energy use, without going through the expensive process of ripping the whole lot down and building an extension. But obviously there is little in place to stop you building anything that takes your fancy :T

    I don't see anything in place to stop you building a substantial frame, covering the whole lot in polycarbonate sheeting then apply to upgrade the walls and the roof, providing what you replace the existing with is up to spec I can't see how they can prevent it :beer:

    I believe that the total area of land you can build on is 50% of what remained when the original house was built. I think there's a time limit regarding older houses and extensions, and permitted development rights do not apply to many new build properties.
  • cyclonebri1
    cyclonebri1 Posts: 12,827 Forumite
    DTDfanBoy wrote: »
    If you wanted to there's nothing to stop you removing the roof and sides from your conservatory and blocking the whole lot up, the walls and roof would have to meet building regs, but the room as a whole wouldn't, providing you have other means of escape from your house I don't see how they can even ask that you keep a door into the garden :eek:

    The change in regs has come about to enable people to upgrade their conservatories into more usable spaces, more insulation = less energy use, without going through the expensive process of ripping the whole lot down and building an extension. But obviously there is little in place to stop you building anything that takes your fancy :T

    I don't see anything in place to stop you building a substantial frame, covering the whole lot in polycarbonate sheeting then apply to upgrade the walls and the roof, providing what you replace the existing with is up to spec I can't see how they can prevent it :beer:

    I believe that the total area of land you can build on is 50% of what remained when the original house was built. I think there's a time limit regarding older houses and extensions, and permitted development rights do not apply to many new build properties.

    That in essence was my point, ;)

    I thought it was less, 25% even, but I wouldn't bet much on it. be nice to have it confirmed though??
    I like the thanks button, but ,please, an I agree button.

    Will the grammar and spelling police respect I do make grammatical errors, and have carp spelling, no need to remind me.;)

    Always expect the unexpected:eek:and then you won't be dissapointed
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.