We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

mobile phones. Statutory rights: Satisfactory quality..

stunews
stunews Posts: 34 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 10 Posts
The screen on my Samsung S3 cracked. I'm not sure how it happened. Consequently, I don't think the unit is up to the wear and tear of everyday life, and I want to return it to the retailer (tmobile & EE), which I understand I can do under my statutory rights as a consumer within 6 months of 'purchase', much as you would if you bought a toaster from argos and it stopped working.

They are telling me to go to Samsung. Which I don't think is correct as it's within the first 6 months of receiving the phone.

What is my position as a consumer? Are they the retailer in this situation? I certainly didn't take the contract for the quality of their calls and data, it was for the acquisition of the phone.

Any thoughts on the legal position appreciated.

Stu

Comments

  • helpthejuggler
    helpthejuggler Posts: 10 Forumite
    edited 7 August 2013 at 11:51AM
    Your purchase was from the retailer. You did not purchase from Samsung so cannot approach them under the Sale of Goods Act for your statutory protection.

    If Samsung offer a warranty that is protection you would approach them under if the phone was faulty.

    If there is systemic problem with screens cracking on S3 then your position is stronger and up to 6 years you can approach the retailer. I doubt this to be the case.

    The biggest hurdle is agreeing that the phone was faulty when new and not fit for purpose. The retailer might argue it was down to your ham-fisted clumsiness.

    If you don't know how a fault happened, the retailer faced with many fault-free S3s probably appears to be on safe ground for what looks like accidental damage.

    Is the phone covered under your home insurance?
  • grumbler
    grumbler Posts: 58,629 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The only way is to sue T-mobile/EE, and IMO you are likely to lose.
  • JJ_Egan
    JJ_Egan Posts: 20,281 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Samsung will not entertain cracked phones under warranty based on multiple previous same posts .

    You really would have to prove not accidental damage but an inherent fault . The same sort of posts on the web are of no use as all who break the glass say it was not me guv .

    jje
  • stunews
    stunews Posts: 34 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts
    thanks for the input.
    think I'll try my home insurance as a first port of call then..
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.