We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

UJM giving permission to access

2

Comments

  • :beer:
    BurnleyBob wrote: »
    You will have to be careful how you couch reasons for not allowing access to guard against an adviser taking personal umbrage.

    Tell them you've been advised against doing so (which you have in this thread). Should they ask by whom, inform them that that's confidential or privileged information that you can't disclose.

    Just explain you're uncomfortable with the idea of the government holding more data on you than they need to.
  • john539
    john539 Posts: 16,968 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    I haven't given the JC permission to access my UJM, however I am registered and they can see this when they look.

    I don't really want to give them permission but am finding that I am getting more and more hassle about it every time I go. I don't know what to say when they keep asking why I won't allow it.

    I am worried about giving access as although I do look every day I am aware that things happen outside my control (me or my son could be ill, internet could be down for the day etc) and don't want an automatic sanction because I haven't logged on for a day.

    What reason does everyone give for not allowing access?

    Thanks
    "You don't know enough about it to give access".

    DWP has not made full disclosure on giving access, not providing any education or training on UJM to jobseekers, not provided any detailed information on UJM, what data is monitored, how it is monitored, how it is collated, how it is being used, but don't say this directly.
  • tokenfield
    tokenfield Posts: 257 Forumite
    BurnleyBob wrote: »
    You're correct.

    But JSA claimants need to stay on the right side of advisers because they wield great power over them, and when the advisers are pressured by a superior to influence claimants to allow them access then many of them submit.

    So you are in agreement that it is OK for JC to intimidate claimants?
  • tokenfield
    tokenfield Posts: 257 Forumite
    Poppie68 wrote: »
    Oh that sounds familiar!
    Careful your starting to give yourself away.;)

    Am I ???????? Woof woof!!!
  • You don't need to give a reason, just quote the data protection act from 19 o blank.

    Sounds like you have an assertiveness issue, these people don't own you, they are civil servants!

    Speak to CAB or some other advocate to get help with asserting your basic human right to privacy if you have no confidence.

    Myself i would just tell them i no longer have internet access due to lack of money!
  • BurnleyBob
    BurnleyBob Posts: 368 Forumite
    tokenfield wrote: »
    So you are in agreement that it is OK for JC to intimidate claimants?

    I'm dead against the jobcentre reign of terror. Lots of people are scared witless of being sanctioned for the petty reasons. What I was trying to convey to the OP is to use subtlety when he's next lent on.
  • BurnleyBob
    BurnleyBob Posts: 368 Forumite
    You don't need to give a reason, just quote the data protection act from 19 o blank.

    Sounds like you have an assertiveness issue, these people don't own you, they are civil servants!

    Speak to CAB or some other advocate to get help with asserting your basic human right to privacy if you have no confidence.

    Myself i would just tell them i no longer have internet access due to lack of money!

    They'd have you to visit the library for internet access or to use their terminals.
  • BurnleyBob wrote: »
    They'd have you to visit the library for internet access or to use their terminals.

    All fine and dandy but they still don't have to give access to the account or be expected to visit every day, so how could they prove OP did or did not?

    And if he wanted to i'm sure he could claim expenses?

    Are there still library's in most towns and city's now?

    Maybe the tory government have closed a lot :cool:
  • OP have a read here https://www.gov.uk/data-protection/the-data-protection-act

    Thankfully we don't have to tell anyone any thing we don't want to, might not be forever but enjoy it while we can.
  • BurnleyBob
    BurnleyBob Posts: 368 Forumite
    All fine and dandy but they still don't have to give access to the account or be expected to visit every day, so how could they prove OP did or did not?

    And if he wanted to i'm sure he could claim expenses?

    Are there still library's in most towns and city's now?

    Maybe the tory government have closed a lot :cool:

    I haven't been inside a jobcentre for 16 years. I remember it was a horrible experience. From the people I know who visit there nowadays I have the impression it's much, much worse in 2013 than then and they want to get in and out of the place as fast as they can with the least amount of hassle and having no home internet access, whether true or not, would cause them grief one way or another.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.