We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Roof terrace not actually a roof terrace

13

Comments

  • Fern123
    Fern123 Posts: 17 Forumite
    Hi jaybeetoo,

    Yes, he did. I have just looked through the report again. He stated that:

    There is a large suspended concrete communal roof terrace accessed from the top of the communal staircase surfaced in asphalt.

    This appeared to be in a satisfactory condition for its purpose, subject to some localised surface cracks noticed earlier.


    Thanks for your help.
  • Fern123
    Fern123 Posts: 17 Forumite
    Hi all,

    Our solicitor has received a response that the roof terrace does not have planning permission and there's nothing on the lease granting access to it or the loft space. We are in agreement that we do not think it would be granted planning permission due to being in a conservation area, and a storey higher than the surrounding properties.

    However, it has been used for this purpose for (at least) 30 years, and so he thinks that the chances of us being stopped from using it are slim. But we would have to take this risk and be prepared to be stopped from using it.

    His next step is to try and get something in writing on the lease about right of access to the terrace and loft, and then we'll go from there. He says if we manage that then will need to assess whether we are comfortable with the price we have paid for the property with the possible loss of outside space and storage.

    Thanks everyone for their advice so far.
  • Dan-Dan
    Dan-Dan Posts: 5,279 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I sense you`ll be reducing your offer by the end of this particular process
    Never, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night.
  • Fern123
    Fern123 Posts: 17 Forumite
    You're right Dan-Dan. Whether they'll accept the lower offer is a different issue entirely! :undecided
  • I agree with your friend and wouldn't want to go up there.

    From counting the bricks the parapet seems about 600mm high, no more than knee height really. It'd be far too easy to take a tumble over that. Quite scary actually.

    Proper railings are around 1100mm high. Sort of stomach height.
  • If everyone is using the roof from the flats you are going to be landed with regular roof repair bills. I would not want to be walking about on that stuff.

    Those walls are really :eek:
  • Fern123
    Fern123 Posts: 17 Forumite
    Just an update on this - the vendor acknowledged that there was no right of access in the lease and no planning permission, and didn't want to rock the boat with the freeholder and other owners by doing anything about it.

    So we reduced our offer which they rejected. This morning we submitted a higher offer, which reflected the price we had originally agreed on, minus what our surveyor told us he had added to his valuation for the roof terrace.

    I've just received a property alert saying it's back on the market, and I feel a bit sick :sad:

    It is a seller's market in our area at the moment and I fear we have lost this property and all the money and time we've put into purchasing it.
  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    Well some people will accept the risk, even if they ask the question in the first place.

    The FH is unlikely to agree access, and if they did would as I explained have to carry out a lot of work to make it useable which will bump your SC. :eek:

    While you are right to adjust the price, some will not, so its all about the risk that you or they are prepared to take.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • Fern123
    Fern123 Posts: 17 Forumite
    We were willing to accept the risk as long as we could negotiate the price to the level of what the property would be without the terrace.

    It seems that we are now being held over a barrel, despite being 10 weeks down the line and ready to exchange bar this issue.
  • The_Pixi
    The_Pixi Posts: 299 Forumite
    Fern123 wrote: »
    We were willing to accept the risk as long as we could negotiate the price to the level of what the property would be without the terrace.

    It seems that we are now being held over a barrel, despite being 10 weeks down the line and ready to exchange bar this issue.

    If you are happy to pay someone, presumably a substantial amount, of money for something they cant actually sell to you, then go for it, you like the flat. :)

    Personally I would let the property go and leave it, knowing I was sensible with my money. OK someone else might buy it with that risk, but they are obviously happy paying over the odds, and taking the mortgage and interest with that as well.
    Mortgage Balance £182,789.00 of £259,250.00 Overpayment Total £48,847.13
    Monthly payment down £258.82 Overpaid last month £1096.38
    End of month 11/2017
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.