We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Estate agents suggesting tax evasion?
Comments
-
paddy's_mum wrote: »I can never understand why the vendor wants to do this as it is fraught with hazard for them.
Imagine this scenario..
The sale has completed, everyone's moved, the paperwork is done, dusted and submitted to the proper authorities. Along comes the vendor saying (nudge,nudge,wink,wink) "Right, I'll take the extra £10 now ... "
"What money is that then, Fred ... what agreement? I said no such thing ...."
Is the vendor really going to take the purchaser to court? The mind boggles -
No, honestly Your Honour, we had an agreement to defraud the tax people....:eek:
Exactly, the vendor would have no case against the buyer for the extra money.
If anything, the buyer would have a potential case against the vendor for harassment. The buyer could say "we have this legally binding contract which the vendor signed stating the purchase price was £250k and now he is demanding more money".
The fixtures and fittings thing is dodgy but not illegal. Say for example you pay another £10k for fixtures and fittings. If the HMRC decide to investigate they will look at what comparable fixtures and fittings are worth on the second hand market. If they conclude they are only worth £5K then they will record the sale as £5k for fixtures & fittings and £255k for the house, meaning another £5k+ will be owed in stamp duty.0 -
The fixtures and fittings thing is dodgy but not illegal. Say for example you pay another £10k for fixtures and fittings. If the HMRC decide to investigate they will look at what comparable fixtures and fittings are worth on the second hand market. If they conclude they are only worth £5K then they will record the sale as £5k for fixtures & fittings and £255k for the house, meaning another £5k+ will be owed in stamp duty.
There is a bit more to it than this. HMRC risk assess cases they consider investigating. £10k F&F on a £250k purchase will be high risk and therefore much more likely to be investigated than say £1k F&F. Not only will the buyer be charged the extra stamp duty, but interest on the tax paid late and a penalty up to 100% of the extra tax due. Plus HMRC can and do successfully take cases such as this to court. Google Orsman v HMRC (2012). Don't forget it is not only the second hand value that HMRC will investigate, but also whether the F&F qualify for SDLT exemption under HMRC rules.It is a good idea to be alone in a garden at dawn or dark so that all its shy presences may haunt you and possess you in a reverie of suspended thought.
James Douglas0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards