PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Insolvency Act Policy

I'm hoping someone can help with this issue as I'm not finding a whole lot on Google.

I'm in the fortunate position of having a property transferred to me as a gift and the solicitor who is handling my side of the arrangement has proposed that I take out an Insolvency Act Policy in case the gifters go bankrupt within 5 years (this is highly unlikely).

They also mentioned that if I was to sell within this 5 year period then a Mortgage company or purchaser would likely require this policy (no plans to sell at present).

So my question is do I need to take this Policy out at this moment in time or could I wait until the possibility of sale becomes more probable (i.e. if 4 years down the line I intended to sell)?

Comments

  • tim123456789
    tim123456789 Posts: 1,787 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I would guess not, as otherwise the insurance company will suspect that you are only taking out the policy because you anticipate the bankruptcy, and decline to cover.
  • lionsixty
    lionsixty Posts: 16 Forumite
    Thanks for your comments, that was my original thought but searching around I saw some people saying that purchasers had asked them to take out a policy at the point of sale because of previous equity arrangements within the previous 5 years (i.e. one partner had signed over the property in full to the other, or one had gifted half the equity to another), exposing the property (or part of) to be set aside under the Insolvency Act.

    I'm not concerned with the risk of insolvency I'm just reluctant to take the policy as we may well stay for over 5 years and not require the cover.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.