We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
After the Work Programme
Comments
-
Yeah a bit like you probably at the JCYes you. Deny evetything you do.
'honest guv I never saw 200 jobs advertised!'We’ve had to remove your signature. Please check the Forum Rules if you’re unsure why it’s been removed and, if still unsure, email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Red Devil, could you not bring me into this. I said via PM that I thought you should just leave this alone now. It's all getting a bit too over the top.0
-
JSA claimant actively seeking employment at or above JSAg.donnajunkie wrote: »csmw is a fan of yours because you hardly ever disagree with them if at all.
DWP advisor advising claimants to actively seek employment at or above JSAg.
Makes sense they'd agree.0 -
You'll struggle to find a post where I've abused anyone.donnajunkie wrote: »because we are not easily fooled. if we see something we know is incorrect we will say so. we meaning everyone who is getting abuse since you 2 arrived in the thread. yes i know you have been on the recieving end also but its mostly deserved. only a very small percentage of your posts can be classed as helpful.
You can't justify abuse because the advice doesn't agree with your opinion.
Nor can you decide a post isn't helpful just because it doesn't suit your agenda.0 -
All things being equal, why wouldn't an actively seeking claimant feel aggrieved about a non actively seeking claimant.Come on peeps, don't turn on each other.
That's they want, divide & rule.
As it is they're probably glad that a fellow claimant is being referred for not doing enough.0 -
I only care about my friends as they care about me.sensibleadvice wrote: »All things being equal, why wouldn't an actively seeking claimant feel aggrieved about a non actively seeking claimant.
As it is they're probably glad that a fellow claimant is being referred for not doing enough.
To be totally honest I care not one jot about anyone else on here who has no job. We all have our crap to deal with.We’ve had to remove your signature. Please check the Forum Rules if you’re unsure why it’s been removed and, if still unsure, email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
-
deciding whether you would employ someone based on forum posts is just as silly as assuming someone is a workshy scrounger based on their forum posts.jacques_chirac wrote: »If she lived in my area I can honestly say I would employ AP007.
Seriously, if you don't like her then use the ignore feature. Your constant bullying is downright nasty.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards