We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
DSLR Canon or Nikon or ????
Comments
-
yangptangkipperbang wrote: »"The amount of people who spend thousands on D/SLRs and lenses and don't understand light, f-stops, exposures, shutter speeds and ISO/film speeds and take the same photo that they would have done with a £50 compact camera is astonishing. You see them all the time; on every facebook photo group etc. They'd have been better off spending the money on a photography course to be honest."
??
Not me That's why you had to cut from another past from a post I didn't make.0 -
Pinkypants wrote: »To a degree, take a picture of a super model in bad light and your'll have a bad picture.
Take a picture of a super model in good light and your'll have a good picture.
BUT
Take the same picture in good light but exchange the model for an ugly bloke and you'll get a bad picture.
Good photography needs both, an interesting or beautiful subject AND good light.
I agree and have already said so but the quote above was a response to a post saying that it was not necessary to be able to see viewfinder.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards