We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

DSLR Canon or Nikon or ????

Options
135

Comments

  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 3 August 2013 at 9:27PM
    He or she...will use whatever camera they can afford I imagine.

    The amount of people who spend thousands on D/SLRs and lenses and don't understand light, f-stops, exposures, shutter speeds and ISO/film speeds and take the same photo that they would have done with a £50 compact camera is astonishing. You see them all the time; on every facebook photo group etc. They'd have been better off spending the money on a photography course to be honest.

    I agree but there are things that a SLR is much better at but people do need to know how to use them.

    I have a compact and DSLR and there have been plenty of times when I have had the compact that I had wished I had the DSLR.
    L
  • The amount of people who spend thousands on D/SLRs and lenses and don't understand light, f-stops, exposures, shutter speeds and ISO/film speeds and take the same photo that they would have done with a £50 compact camera is astonishing. You see them all the time; on every facebook photo group etc. They'd have been better off spending the money on a photography course to be honest.

    So, so true ................ and of course, a better quality lens/camera makes a lousy photograph look even worse - the telegraph pole growing out of your wife's head is perfectly exposed and focused :rotfl::rotfl:
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    So, so true ................ and of course, a better quality lens/camera makes a lousy photograph look even worse - the telegraph pole growing out of your wife's head is perfectly exposed and focused :rotfl::rotfl:

    Mind you on a bright day it's a lot easier to see that telegraph pole through a viewfinder than on a LCD screen.
  • ukcarper wrote: »
    Mind you on a bright day it's a lot easier to see that telegraph pole through a viewfinder than on a LCD screen.

    Even easier to see it with your eyes ;)
    Sanctimonious Veggie. GYO-er. Seed Saver. Get in.
  • A._Badger
    A._Badger Posts: 5,881 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    He or she...will use whatever camera they can afford I imagine.

    The amount of people who spend thousands on D/SLRs and lenses and don't understand light, f-stops, exposures, shutter speeds and ISO/film speeds and take the same photo that they would have done with a £50 compact camera is astonishing. You see them all the time; on every facebook photo group etc. They'd have been better off spending the money on a photography course to be honest.

    The OP has already said she has outgrown her bridge camera. It is unlikely that a sealed box with a milk bottle for a lens will satisfy her needs at this point.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Even easier to see it with your eyes ;)

    Have you got the viewfinder for your Olympus as I find it can be very difficult to frame a photo on bright days using screen on my compact and quite often have to resort to guess work.
  • ukcarper wrote: »
    Mind you on a bright day it's a lot easier to see that telegraph pole through a viewfinder than on a LCD screen.

    True - but most of the people you refer to still use live view on their DSLR :cool:
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    True - but most of the people you refer to still use live view on their DSLR :cool:

    I don't think I have referred to anybody.
  • A._Badger wrote: »
    The OP has already said she has outgrown her bridge camera. It is unlikely that a sealed box with a milk bottle for a lens will satisfy her needs at this point.

    I didn't in any way say that it is time to build a camera themselves. I actually recommended looking at a Micro 4/3 which is perfectly fantastic as an everyday camera...alot of people don't even know they exist hence responding to someone asking about which next camera to get on an internet forum. Next time, I'll remember to run my opinions by you before bothering eh?

    Although building your own camera can be a fantastically exhilarating experience.
    Sanctimonious Veggie. GYO-er. Seed Saver. Get in.
  • ukcarper wrote: »
    Have you got the viewfinder for your Olympus as I find it can be very difficult to frame a photo on bright days using screen on my compact and quite often have to resort to guess work.

    I rarely take photos in the extreme sun; it bleaches out the highlights and it's just too bright. I prefer early mornings, just after the rain or late afternoons. Again, it's about the light.

    I am used to taking analogue photos on my holga and other array of film cameras, plenty of which come without a viewfinder at all...and I often shoot from the hip rather than the eye...so am well used to not framing everything before taking.
    Sanctimonious Veggie. GYO-er. Seed Saver. Get in.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.