Parliamentary Health Services Ombudsman

antrobus

agrinnall wrote: »

I hope you have the stamina to keep going, because I'm enjoying this thread a lot more since you decided to get involved :j.

Oh, I'll give it a whirl.:)

oneye14 wrote: »

Obviously not ....

There's nothing obvious in this thread.

oneye14 wrote: »

Which bit of
Falsifying Companies House records
do you not understand.... ..

Well given that Companies House exists in order to record information regarding limited companies and the suchlike, 'falsifying records' is a rather generic accusation. Can you be more specific?

oneye14 wrote: »

...
You really are a Timewasting Troll.. and thanks for naming you buddies in post #36 above ..

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

cheapskate101

BobQ wrote: »

Fair enough it was not you, I humbly apologise Oneye

Still interested to know where Cheapskate got his statistic from.

Annual report.

The single case cost investigated by the uk Ombudsman is :

£83, 333

The PHSO has more employees (435) than investigated cases(384)

Percentage of investigated cases : 1.4


It seems to be the most ineffective and expensive Ombudsman going.

:::

By comparison:

Hong Kong

Single investigated case cost £3369
( it's an average figure for other Ombudsmen)

Number of employees. 111

Investigated Cases 2285

Percentage of cases investigated 41

....

Netherlands

Cost £14.3m

Cases 15165

Investigations.. 4689

Percentage cases investigated 31

Employees 147

Investigated Single case cost £3049