We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
BoE warns of risks of rate rises.
Comments
- 
            Its like a game of chess you can't win........
 That game of chess often goes like this:
 - bishop A4 to A8...checkmate!
 - you can't do that, bishops only move diagonally
 - i never said bishop!
 - you sure did, and only queen and rook can do A4 to A8
 - oh! we're talking about queens and rooks now eh?? Trying to change the subject now you're losing?
 - not at all. Just pointing out the rules of the game.
 - ok, but you're still checkmate
 - no I'm not.
 - that's it, I'm out!!0
- 
             
 I fear I've been playing this down.
 thisismoney.co.uk have a feature on this with a ticking timebomb
 Things must be bad - they've not used that image for a couple of weeks.0
- 
            grizzly1911 wrote: »Why are you asking me you seem to know the answer.
 I thought I'd have a go at 'bottoming out' this discussion once and for all. I don't want to put words into your mouth, so could you emplain why you think interest rates in most developed countries are at their lowest in history?0
- 
            Graham_Devon wrote: »Really? I mean....what a surprise!
 Sorry, I only just spotted this. Your sarcastic response is actually very interesting and probably more enlightening than you think.
 You're clearly admitting that you're having the same discussions with the same people (and by the total number of posts, and years on MSE evidenced on your profile) you've been doing this over many, many years. Do you not find it all rather tedious and time wasting?
 (this is an open question to everyone on here, not just this chap)0
- 
            You've tried hard reno. Your contributions to the forum so far under this name have been welcome, interesting and thought provoking..
 Just stay that way, then there are no issues.0
- 
            Sounds like the SCA (socky complaint army) are mobilising for deployment.
 Nice knowing you OffGridLiving.0
- 
            Sheriff Devon is on the case now.Official MR B fan club,dont go............................0
- 
            Graham_Devon wrote: »You've tried hard reno. Your contributions to the forum so far under this name have been welcome, interesting and thought provoking..
 Just stay that way, then there are no issues.
 Erm, I don't understand. Are you threatening me in some way?0
- 
            Nice knowing you OffGridLiving.
 I must admit to being a little confused, is Graham_Devon a moderator?
 Even so, I've no idea how I've caused offence? I checked the forum rules and there is nothing in there about not being allowed to question whether it's worth discussing certain subjects when the debaters are so entrenched in their views that the discourse is circular and therefore pointless?
 Apologies to anyone who may have taken offence, but with finance and economics being such a vast subject, I just felt that there is plenty enough to discuss without going over the same areas again and again without any ground given or taken. It's like trench warfare without end.0
- 
            OffGridLiving wrote: »I must admit to being a little confused, is Graham_Devon a moderator?
 Even so, I've no idea how I've caused offence? I checked the forum rules and there is nothing in there about not being allowed to question whether it's worth discussing certain subjects when the debaters are so entrenched in their views that the discourse is circular and therefore pointless?
 Apologies to anyone who may have taken offence, but with finance and economics being such a vast subject, I just felt that there is plenty enough to discuss without going over the same areas again and again without any ground given or taken. It's like trench warfare without end.
 Don't worry about it - the same thing happened to me the first time I challenged him on one of his muddles - his fallback position is to suggest you're the re-incarnation of a previously-banned poster.
 As for being a moderator - only if we're talking about being at the moderate end of "we're all doomed".I am an IFA. Any comments made on this forum are provided for information only and should not be construed as advice. Should you need advice on a specific area then please consult a local IFA.0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
          
         