We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
VENT-Doctors Receptionists
Options
Comments
-
Thing is, if medical staff do have access to medical records of patients they should not be discussing the contents with anyone else, or for that matter, discussing the reasons patients visit, whether (in their opinion), those visits are for trivial matters or not. I'm not disputing that they do see those records, but; as medical receptionists they too should be bound by confidentiality agreements.
That's what's concerning me. When I go to my GPs I invariably see someone I know. But I don't sit in the waiting room discussing my ailments or theirs.
In my professional role there are issues I am not at liberty to discuss. Medical receptionists should not be gossiping about patients. It's nothing to do with naivety or otherwise.
But I stand by my statement that medical receptionists have no need to read patient's notes.Don't put it DOWN; put it AWAY"I would like more sisters, that the taking out of one, might not leave such stillness" Emily DickinsonJanice 1964-2016
Thank you Honey Bear0 -
Because the doctors often tell the Receptionists to ask "certain" patients what the problem is before they are supposed to give them an appointment. The ones who are in the surgery 3 times a week I would guess. Effectively they are a filter system.
Additionally, you are really naive if you think practice staff do not have access to patient records. I was a Medical Secretary and patient notes are confidential but not to just the doctor.
Valli wasn't saying that the receptionist doesn't have access to records, merely that their trawling through them to decide who did and who didn't have a legitimate reason for making an appointment so they can then tell their friends that half are time-wasters isn't a good reason for accessing them."Growth for growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell" - Edward Abbey.0 -
Thing is, if medical staff do have access to medical records of patients they should not be discussing the contents with anyone else, or for that matter, discussing the reasons patients visit, whether (in their opinion), those visits are for trivial matters or not. I'm not disputing that they do see those records, but; as medical receptionists they too should be bound by confidentiality agreements.
That's what's concerning me. When I go to my GPs I invariably see someone I know. But I don't sit in the waiting room discussing my ailments or theirs.
And of course they are bound by them.
I am not sure what you are implying here, my friend made a general remark, not a remark specific to any one patient or group of patients. I have never heard her say anything which breaches confidentiality. Like everyone she discusses work in general terms but not in specifics. Like it or not they are often put on the front line by doctors who are sick of Mr or Mrs x presenting twice a week at the surgery for no concrete reason and they are expected to dig to see if an appointment is really needed.0 -
fluffnutter wrote: »Valli wasn't saying that the receptionist doesn't have access to records, merely that their trawling through them to decide who did and who didn't have a legitimate reason for making an appointment so they can then tell their friends that half are time-wasters isn't a good reason for accessing them.
I agree, and that is not what is done in my experience.0 -
-
And of course they are bound by them.
I am not sure what you are implying here, my friend made a general remark, not a remark specific to any one patient or group of patients. I have never heard her say anything which breaches confidentiality. Like everyone she discusses work in general terms but not in specifics. Like it or not they are often put on the front line by doctors who are sick of Mr or Mrs x presenting twice a week at the surgery for no concrete reason and they are expected to dig to see if an appointment is really needed.
Fair enough - I accept that it does depend on the circumstances as to how a comment may be made but I would be concerned if your friend had arrived at this conclusion from accessing records rather than, say, a practice meeting where, for example, strategies to cut down on unnecessary visits with reference to statistical evidence were discussed.Don't put it DOWN; put it AWAY"I would like more sisters, that the taking out of one, might not leave such stillness" Emily DickinsonJanice 1964-2016
Thank you Honey Bear0 -
Fair enough - I accept that it does depend on the circumstances as to how a comment may be made but I would be concerned if your friend had arrived at this conclusion from accessing records rather than, say, a practice meeting where, for example, strategies to cut down on unnecessary visits with reference to statistical evidence were discussed.
When answering the phone to a patient requesting an appointment I doubt there would be time to do that. In any event it comes direct from the doctors and often my friend feels very uncomfortable about asking but if she doesn't the doctors take them to task about it. She was a patient at the practice before she worked there and she said working there had shown her a different side to several of the doctors.
Ultimately, of course, anyone who is persistent enough will get an appointment and then the doctors get annoyed with the receptionist for not putting them off effectively enough.0 -
This thread reminds me of the old joke, about getting past the receptionist first if you want to see a doctor
Our receptionists are great, so I'm pretty lucky in that respect. Mind you, my own anxiety issues mean I don't see the doc if I can possibly avoid it.
I can usually get an appointment with my regular doc within a week, but we had one doctor (who at one time was the only lady doc) who was always booked solid!0 -
marywooyeah wrote: »Skint by any chance?
That would be the one :jNeeding to lose weight start date 26 December 2011 current loss 60 pound Down. Lots more to go to get into my size 6 jeans0 -
mightyroyals wrote: »Just a little vent really i suffer from health anxiety and proberbly goto the doctors about twice a month maybe three times on a bad month. Anyways i called my Doctors surgery up to get an appointment today and after waiting on hold for 10 mins or so i get through to a receptionist where i give my name and the response i get is a "Sigh" with "Oh God" almost to say here we go again another appointment, This really annoys me as she does not know me or my situation. This time i really needed to see a Doc as i have had severe stomach pain for 2 weeks and had been holding back going but now i have cancelled my appointment as i don't want to go to a surgery that is being like that. Sorry just a vent really at the rudeness of Doctors surgery..................
....I'm smiling because I have no idea what's going on ...:)
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards