We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Employer changed reason for dismissal after fact
Options

Little_Missy
Posts: 48 Forumite

Hi all,
I have been attempting to post this within 'Employment, Jobseeking & Training', but the link will not open for some reason........sorry for having to post it here, but hoping somebody might be able to help.
A friend of mine was dismissed, in writing without notice, after 6 months employment; the reason given was that he was not suitable for a long term position within the company. He and his employer subsequently fell out and his employer then wrote to him, following his dismissal, alleging that he had done various things that he should not have prior to being dismissed. His employer is now attempting to say that he was dismissed for gross misconduct, but the letter that was initially sent to him advising that he was dismissed simply said that he was not suitable for a long term position.
My friend is owed outstanding wages and intends to take the matter to the Employment Tribunal. Will the Tribunal deal with the matter of the changed reasons for dismissal? If the Tribunal will not deal with the issue (perhaps due to his short service?), will the Civil Courts deal with it?
He is very concerned that his former employer may advise any future prospective employer that he was dismissed for gross misconduct and this is completely untrue.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
I have been attempting to post this within 'Employment, Jobseeking & Training', but the link will not open for some reason........sorry for having to post it here, but hoping somebody might be able to help.
A friend of mine was dismissed, in writing without notice, after 6 months employment; the reason given was that he was not suitable for a long term position within the company. He and his employer subsequently fell out and his employer then wrote to him, following his dismissal, alleging that he had done various things that he should not have prior to being dismissed. His employer is now attempting to say that he was dismissed for gross misconduct, but the letter that was initially sent to him advising that he was dismissed simply said that he was not suitable for a long term position.
My friend is owed outstanding wages and intends to take the matter to the Employment Tribunal. Will the Tribunal deal with the matter of the changed reasons for dismissal? If the Tribunal will not deal with the issue (perhaps due to his short service?), will the Civil Courts deal with it?
He is very concerned that his former employer may advise any future prospective employer that he was dismissed for gross misconduct and this is completely untrue.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards