We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Want to let my property without Consent to Let?
Options
Comments
-
If we get CTL, then no I cannot afford to let out the property, which is what I was considering letting it without getting consent. Letting without this CTL would mean I am able to move, still cover my mortgage, as well as other costs (insurances etc) and make a small profit, to be saved in case anything went wrong wih the property.
I am not considering this option to make money, or to rip off my lender, I am considering because I have no other option, due to the downturn in the market.
And negative equity is a bigger *****!
But of course you are "considering this option to make money, or to rip off my lender..."
You 'make money' via a) your 'small profit' and b) by avoiding the losses.
You rip off the lender by increasing their risk, not paying the fees due, and breaching the terms of your contract.
I agree with others that frankly letting is not the solution - it brings all sorts of risks. Reduce the price, pay off the negative equity, put the property behind you and move on with life.0 -
If we get CTL, then no I cannot afford to let out the property, which is what I was considering letting it without getting consent. Letting without this CTL would mean I am able to move, still cover my mortgage, as well as other costs (insurances etc) and make a small profit, to be saved in case anything went wrong wih the property.
I am not considering this option to make money, or to rip off my lender, I am considering because I have no other option, due to the downturn in the market.0 -
Thanks everyone. Will just keep waiting and hoping my mortgage lender will reduce their rates for CTL in the not too distant future.
Just so frustrating being stuck due my flat.0 -
morpheusfire wrote: »Completely understand the OPs position.
I have a mortgage with HSBC on a residential property I bought 2 years ago.
Had to move jobs after 6 months and asked for CTL, which they granted for 12 months.
Requested CTL again in December which they granted again for 12 months.
Now I'm off their fixed rate and onto their variable rate, which they have generously reduced, I will rent out the property for the next 6 months until CTL runs out and then ask for it again.
Not sure if they will change my rate, regardless of whether they grant CTL or not (they didn't previously) because if they do then I will have to put some money down to change it to a buy-to-let.
My issue is that I have enough saved to put money down for another deposit, which I don't want to use on the original property (hoping to get CTL for a while and use it as an investment!)
What are peoples' thoughts on the chances of me getting another residential mortgage if I got CTL on the first one? (mine and my partner's salaries could cover both mortgages and my unsecured loan if necessary)
Depends on the lender. Most will not consider the rental income as you don't have enough of a history as a land-lord (HSBC for example requires 3 years tax returns showing your rental income) and as it is formally still a residential Mortgage rather than a Buy to Let Mortgage, they'll include the existing Mortgage payments as an outgoing, vastly reducing the amount you can borrow.
As an aside, whilst HSBC doesn't charge punitive rates/admin fees unlike most lenders when applying for CTL, they will not grant CTL indefinitely (you're lucky to get it 2 years in a row, I'd be very surprised if you got a 3rd year), you need to sort that out at some point.
If you qualify for their BTL Mortgages that's your best option (it'll cost you more, and the criteria is strict). Otherwise talk to someone in branch and get their opinion.0 -
I am an accidental landlord in an unusual situation.
I paid off my (Vrgn1) current account mortgage 6 years ago but did not close it. The account is now in credit (by quite a bit). I am keeping it open in case I ever need the facility, but I have no plans for using it right now. There is 12 years still to run on it.
The LTV would be around one third, even if I made withdrawals right up to the amount on the facility. So risk-wise it is a no-brainer for the bank. It is as good a bet as they could hope to have.
I moved to another town a few years ago and live with my partner there, in her place. So I let my house to tenants (without even realising the bank might want to know about this). They are very good tenants, the rent is always paid on time and the place is kept in excellent condition. If they move out, I could easily get new tenants at the same or higher rent.
A busy-body in the council told the bank it was a rented property and now the bank (v1) are chasing me to fill obtain Consent To Let from them. I don't want to engage with this process, as I suspect they may refuse it on stupid technicalities (it is in reality a very safe loan but their crude ways of assessing risk way not judge it that way).
What will happen if I just ignore them? They owe me money - not the other way round. So they have no leverage over me in terms of increasing interest rates.
I suppose they could ask me to close the account due to breach of contract - but I doubt they will go that far. I have never been in arrears in the whole 13 years I've had the mortgage.
I'd like to keep the facility if I can; it might come in very useful one day! And I don't really want to pay them an annual fee (and go through annual hassle) for CTL either.
Does anyone have any experience of cases like this?0 -
You are breaking the terms of your mortgage by having let it out without consent to let.
The lender is completely within its rights to force you to redeem the mortgage if you refuse to engage with it.
Do you really want the hassle?
Have you complied with all your other LL obligations? Gas safety check? LL's insurance?0 -
Hi everyone,
I'm hoping someone can help me! I purchased my property in 2007 at the height of the property boom, and now want to move. I am currently on my mortgage lenders variable rate, as our fixed term has now finished. We have had it on the market now for 18 months, at a price 10% lower than the price we paid, and have been unable to sell. We are unable to drop the price any further due to the outstanding mortgage (we were already looking at losing £16k if we sell at the current asking price).
Properties in our area rent out very quickly, as and we are now wanting to rent out our flat. At the rental income we would receive (minus landlords insurance/agents fees etc) we would be making a profit of around £60p/m on the flat -nothing significant.
I contacted my lender regading CTL, and they have said that yes they are happy to grant this, but only if we pay £1000 fee, and they will then increase our payments by nearly £400 p/m!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This would make the mortgage cost much higher than the rental income, and therefore we would be unable to move.
We are in a very difficult situation as we are desperate to move. We have seen several mortgage advisers who have 'unofficially' advised us to rent the property without gaining CTL, telling us 'everyone does it', and some even admitting to doing it themselves. We are now considering whether this is something we should do.
We are not thinking of doing this to make a profit (and would be making very little), but purely because we are stuck.
I am worried to death about what could happen if our mortgage lender finds out, and we haven't got the correct CTL.
Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
you decide what you want to do, and then do it...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards