PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Would a 1970s timber framed house be mortgageable?

We are interested in buying a bungalow in Wales. We have been advised that the construction is a timber frame built on a brick base. The bungalow was supposedly built in the 1970s by a local builder. There is supposedly a timber frame with marine plywood on the outside which has a timber cladding on top. On the inside it is plaster-boarded.

I have spoken to a surveyor who says that this kind of property would probably be difficult to get a mortgage for. We don't need a mortgage but obviously it would affect the resale potential if it were not possible to obtain a mortgage for it.

As far as whether the building is watertight and structurally sound the surveyor has said that if there are no signs of damp anywhere then he would have to assume that the building was structurally sound. He said the only way to ascertain what was going on under the surface would be to remove parts of the cladding or parts of the plaster board or even parts of the floor. Obviously the vendors would not welcome such intrusive measures so would probably not agree to it. Also that is not something the surveyor would get into himself.

Does anybody have any experience in this area which might help? The vendor did not need a mortgage and neither did the previous owner so neither of them bothered to look into it.

Obviously we can have a full survey done which would tell us how structurally sound the building might be but if the house is not mortgageable then that could be a problem. Is there a rule of thumb to apply to the value of a property if it is not mortgageable? i.e. would it be worth 20% less for example than if it were mortgageable?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 346.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 451.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 238.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 613.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 174.5K Life & Family
  • 251.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.