We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Suing council- need a case law/statute
Options

thesim
Posts: 411 Forumite

Found what was needed
0
Comments
-
Im so confused by this: the judge wants case law from you?!?!
You ate magistrates court or high court?
Has the council admitted fault?
Sorry need more background on this (i wont have the case law, but i can certainly tell you that something smells fishy, and it isn't my supper!)0 -
Theft and Fraud from paying too much council tax? that doesn't sound likely to me - these words have absolutely nothing to do with the poor administration of taxes. Are you sure a JUDGE told you this?
I'd suggest a quick half-hour session with a solicitor would be a starting point.
I agree that this smells very fishy!Thinking critically since 1996....0 -
It sounds like something a small claims court judge might ask. Basically s/he is telling you to produce evidence that you have a case to answer, in law.I'm a retired employment solicitor. Hopefully some of my comments might be useful, but they are only my opinion and not intended as legal advice.0
-
Daisy - not disputing that a lay judge may ask for this. Your absolutely correct that they would want case law to back up their decision.
But there must be more to this (theft and fraud are criminal matters for one thing, and the police would be involved). What have the council said about this?0 -
So basically the council didn't calculate your benefit entitlement correctly and you paid more rent and CT than you needed to. They have refunded some overpayment but not all.
I think that unless you can show the judge a precedent where a benefit claimant has successfully sued a council for refund of overpayment, you will lose the case.
I do not know anything about the niceties of benefits legislation, but does it state that benefits must be or can be up to the maximum permitted amount for the relevant income.If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales0 -
I must disagree with lincroft on this one. Purely on the basis that just because there is no case law/precedent, does not mean you will lose.
I am unable to help you with the case law, but can certainly tell you, if you have documentation that the council admitted it's error, and have refunded even partially, they have legally admitted the debt. You should not require case law (though of course it does help) to suceed in your action, which is legitimate.
At this stage I would go to Citizen's Advice and ask them if they have any records like this. If anyone will have quick access (72 hours or so) it'll be them. I'm sure this is not the first time this has happened, it just may be the first time the council has not refunded the full amount and decided to take it to court. If so, this is a test case, and that by no means makes your claim any less legitimate.0 -
Daisy - not disputing that a lay judge may ask for this.
I understand why you might say this, but it is a complete misunderstanding of the process. Even in the small claims court, the judges are qualified solicitors and legally trained. There is in fact no separate jusrisdiction as 'the small claims court' it is merely a part of the county court that deals with claims under £10000. But in ANY court, it is up to the claimant to satisfy the court that s/he has a claim in law. Mostly this is not necessary because the law is clear cut and it is more to do with whether the facts prove a case within the established law. But it is not unusual for the judge to require the claimant to show that s/he has a case in law (laws and morals being completely different). So the judge is directing the claimant to produce the statutory provision or case law on which he relies in his assertion that the defendant is at fault (in law). The defendent can't simply say 'well it is common sense' because the law doesn't always follow common sense.I'm a retired employment solicitor. Hopefully some of my comments might be useful, but they are only my opinion and not intended as legal advice.0 -
I can pretty safely say that if you did by some chance manage to win in the small claims court that the council & DWP would appeal the decision all of the way.I no longer work in Council Tax Recovery but instead work as a specialist Council Tax paralegal assisting landlords and Council Tax payers with council tax disputes and valuation tribunals. My views are my own reading of the law and you should always check with the local authority in question.0
-
along the lines of theft, fraud etc where
Can you define why you think it's theft or fraud ?.I no longer work in Council Tax Recovery but instead work as a specialist Council Tax paralegal assisting landlords and Council Tax payers with council tax disputes and valuation tribunals. My views are my own reading of the law and you should always check with the local authority in question.0 -
zzzLazyDaisy wrote: »I understand why you might say this, but it is a complete misunderstanding of the process. Even in the small claims court, the judges are qualified solicitors and legally trained. There is in fact no separate jusrisdiction as 'the small claims court' it is merely a part of the county court that deals with claims under £10000. But in ANY court, it is up to the claimant to satisfy the court that s/he has a claim in law. Mostly this is not necessary because the law is clear cut and it is more to do with whether the facts prove a case within the established law. But it is not unusual for the judge to require the claimant to show that s/he has a case in law (laws and morals being completely different). So the judge is directing the claimant to produce the statutory provision or case law on which he relies in his assertion that the defendant is at fault (in law). The defendent can't simply say 'well it is common sense' because the law doesn't always follow common sense.
Not disputing what you're saying by any means, I'm aware of the process (to a point), however you clearly have expert knowldge of this and i'll concede. I was just trying to establish that whilst no case law may exist, this does not mean the law does not. The law defintely does not follow common sense!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards