rachel has been very busy at parking eye

kirkbyinfurnesslad_2

How busy are parking eye today!!!!

Rachel and her new assistant must be busy at their keyboards.

They will need a team of perry masons to win all these cases

Half_way

there seems to be quite a few reports on various forums including this, and those are probably only a selection of them.
At what stage would it be possible to have Parking eye listed as Vexatious Litigants?

Stroma

I've said it before they need to recruit an army for these spurious claims, the sooner the wheel falls off for these scumbags the better.

kirkbyinfurnesslad_2

Stroma wrote: »

I've said it before they need to recruit an army for these spurious claims, the sooner the wheel falls off for these scumbags the better.

I do however think that Parking eye claims are more likely then not to actually make it to the court room then CEL's claims

Half_way

Isnt the first case due soemtime next month?
if this is well defended and chucked out on a simalar vein to Ibotson vs VCS then the impact will be interesting.

On a side note, someone on pepipoo is going down the planing permision route with regards to the cameras on poles.
This is not the only hurdle, theres also the issue of the retail park/car park having planing contraints on it, such as free parking for a signifficantly longer time that the PPCs allow for, and the ability for people parking in the car park to use the local shops and facilities.
this is one thing that I have been trying to find/search for on various local authority planing websites, but with out much luck.

And then to top it all off there is also the buisness rate aspent, if its a free car park then the rates are lower/nil, if theres a charging system in place ( ie pay and display) then the rates are higher.
When a PPC infests a free car park, acting on behalf of the car park owner they start imposing charges on that land, therefore the car park owner should be paying the appropiate buisness rates for that land.

kirkbyinfurnesslad_2

Halfway that is the case

Seems to have been about 12 new cases alone today

judasblitzkrieg

Hmmm,

Currently for me PE are being a bit slack. I sent a response to their last threatogram weeks ago with instructions to respond to me within a certain period of time and I've heard nothing.

Not that I'm complaining mind

Kite2010

They want to see as having teeth, sadly those teeth are broken and got lost.

AltheHibby

Have they tried it on in Scotland?

Kite2010

I want to see one of their cases for a high profile client head to court, only to lose so badly the client's name gets dragged in the dirt of the media.

Umkomaas

Kite2010 wrote: »

I want to see one of their cases for a high profile client head to court, only to lose so badly the client's name gets dragged in the dirt of the media.

It would be great to see the likes of Aldi or Morrisons being required by the defendant to appear alongside PE in a court case. After all PE is acting as their agent, and therefore the landowner must be fully acquainted with the case and in full and total agreement with their agent in taking one of their customers through the court system.

Would make wonderful press