please delete

RuthnJasper

fluffnutter wrote: »

I've posted a couple of lighthearted comments but actually, the OP's post has really annoyed me. For anyone who didn't read it, the title said something like 'Peter Andre going too far...' and the opening post said 'Was quite disgusted to see his son posing in Boss pants on his reality TV show. Do these people not think of the dangers..'

Those 'dangers' obviously being that some 'paedo' is going to think that Peter Andre's little boy is fair game or something equally unsavoury. People judge others by their own standards. Personally I think a boy in pants is just that - a boy in pants. If you want to read more into it OP, then crack on, but to me that's just silly, paranoid nonsense.

Looks like you've come to your senses anyway because you've deleted it now. Next time, try the Daily Mail not MSE.

I totally agree with Fluffnutter. What's next? No news reports filmed on beaches because there are kids in swimsuits in the background? No local newspaper reports on kiddies' success in swimming galas because pervs will see the young boys in their trunks?! It's madness, and a very, very sad situation when someone sees a happy innocent child in beachwear, undies or pyjamas and their first thought is of how appealing that will be to disturbed and sick minds.

Having said that, however, I now recall that my dog Jasper not only made numerous appearances onstage as "Bullseye" in Oliver! clad only in the character's trademark red spotted neckerchief, but was also filmed for a BBC3 documentary - and all with his pinkle and botty-bits on clear display! :eek::eek::eek: I'm going to lock myself in a bunker now and destroy the key!!!