We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Bought new house, unexpected rent demand
Comments
-
I'd just pay the £60 and be done.0
-
Thank you for all the replies.
I was not sent a copy of the register by the conveyancer.
I have spoken to them and they told me the previous owner had mentioned the matter but they had not received any demands for payment recently, as a consequence I was not told about the situation. I have been advised I am still liable for the payment.
On the register my name is in the title absolute.
The rent thing is mentioned as a covenant in the charges section.
The charge is gone if I pay 10x the yearly rent, just over £60.
I'd definitely make a formal complaint to the solicitors then, on the basis of what you've outlined on here. They negligently failed to supply you with information about legal liabilities you may incur. You could, for example, have used the information to negotiate a lower purchase price had you known.
It sounds as though you are indeed liable for the payment; your choice whether to pay rent or buy them out, but as it's only £60 I'd be minded to buy them out and I would then ask the solicitors to reimburse you.0 -
I'd definitely make a formal complaint to the solicitors then, on the basis of what you've outlined on here. They negligently failed to supply you with information about legal liabilities you may incur. You could, for example, have used the information to negotiate a lower purchase price had you known.
It sounds as though you are indeed liable for the payment; your choice whether to pay rent or buy them out, but as it's only £60 I'd be minded to buy them out and I would then ask the solicitors to reimburse you.
This sound similar to the type of historical rent payment associated with my house. I thought if the vendor has never received demands then a fee equivalent to 6? years rent is payable by vendor to the new owner as part of the sale transaction (because 6? years is as far back as unpaid rent can be claimed).
That's the situation with our property according to our sols anyway0 -
A Chief Rent can be payable on Freehold properties and is not that unusual - so all the talk of leasehold's is irrelevant. Your solicitor should have picked this up, however, in the greater scheme of things would £60 have made a big difference to your purchase price? I'd get your solicitor to confirm whether it's payable and then just pay it.0
-
Ask your solicitor to pay it, or you will make a formal complaint. It was their job to make you aware of this charge.0
-
If you are going to "redeem", it looks as though you will need to be sure that the correct legal procedure is followed to "extinguish" the charge - see link in post 12 above.0
-
If you are going to "redeem", it looks as though you will need to be sure that the correct legal procedure is followed to "extinguish" the charge - see link in post 12 above.
Absolutely, but use a better solicitor than the one that did your conveyancing, he should have made you aware of this rent regardless of whether it was being collected or not, and pointed out the risks involved with it.
The very least he should have done is given you a copy of the title register.
The only exception would have been if his contract with you laid the responsibilty with you, to find out about rents and charges payable.0 -
Again, thank you everyone for all the advice and feedback. I think I will pay it off and get rid. Cheers!0
-
We purchased our house in January which is listed as freehold aswel as leasehold. Apparently the whole of the land/garden the house is built on has a 999 year lease.
The previous occupants used to pay around £3 a year for the lease, but never paid anything for the last 8-10 years of living there. Not sure why payments stopped, but they've never had any demands or letters as such.
Our solicitor told us the leaseholders can only claim 6 years previous so it wouldn't amount to much if we did ever receive anything.
It does mention in our paperwork that the previous owner took out an indemnity policy for the amount they purchased the house for, & it has been updated to the amount we bought it for.
Is this some sort of protection or insurance for the leasehold?
The whole of the street was once leasehold, & there are still a few houses listed still, but most ppl bought out the leases.
I do worry that we could get a big bill someday though but I guess £3 a year isn't a massive chunk.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards