We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a very Happy New Year. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

Sue council for lack of planning enforcement?

13»

Comments

  • terryw
    terryw Posts: 4,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    mysk_girl wrote: »
    The neighbour made a complaint to the council. The planning department sent an officer round and they said that if the situation didn't improve that there could be problems renewing their planning permission to run a business from home. I believe it has to be renewed periodically. The designated spaces were mediated by the planning official as acceptable.

    Sorry but I disagree. Planning Permission is not required for a child-minder working from home. Do a quick google check and you will see what I mean.

    The official has "mediated". Yep, he has tried to keep everyone happy. I doubt very much if he "theatened"

    Until the Op returns with the wording of the terms of the "Planning Permission" we are all just guessing in the dark. Over to you OP.

    As an aside to this whole debate, I think that child-minders do a sterling job. Councils generally encourage rather than stop them.
    "If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
    Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools"
    Extract from "If" by Rudyard Kipling
  • atrixblue.-MFR-.
    atrixblue.-MFR-. Posts: 6,887 Forumite
    terryw wrote: »
    Sorry but I disagree. Planning Permission is not required for a child-minder working from home. Do a quick google check and you will see what I mean.

    The official has "mediated". Yep, he has tried to keep everyone happy. I doubt very much if he "theatened"

    Until the Op returns with the wording of the terms of the "Planning Permission" we are all just guessing in the dark. Over to you OP.

    As an aside to this whole debate, I think that child-minders do a sterling job. Councils generally encourage rather than stop them.

    childminders are great dont get me wrong, but its a little more than just asking the council for a license and being given it with no risk assessment to the surroundings or internal building if the road was deamed as not suitable for the extra volume propesed or posed as a risk to surrounding residents etc etc etc, then the alternative rout will be her designated rout for customer access if this risk assessed as suitable access.
  • atrixblue.-MFR-.
    atrixblue.-MFR-. Posts: 6,887 Forumite
    terryw wrote: »
    Thanks. Looks like good advice. What happens if there is a fire or an emergency (God forbid)?

    oh wow now your taking it to extremes, ill inform you that a street in my main town has been gate blocked at one end and access from oneside only, council approved of it and were the brainchilds behind it.

    they see no issue with fire entrance as they are informed of a closed one end and know to go to the entrance for the street.
  • terryw
    terryw Posts: 4,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    oh wow now your taking it to extremes, ill inform you that a street in my main town has been gate blocked at one end and access from oneside only, council approved of it and were the brainchilds behind it.

    they see no issue with fire entrance as they are informed of a closed one end and know to go to the entrance for the street.

    I was referring to the entrance to the building being locked.
    "If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
    Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools"
    Extract from "If" by Rudyard Kipling
  • Georgiegirl256
    Georgiegirl256 Posts: 7,005 Forumite
    We live on a cul-de-sac too, which is oposite a senior school. The parents park down either side of the close, and across the pavements at the top, which makes it like an obsticle course, and really hard to see put onto the main road because of cars either side blocking the view. As far as I'm aware, there isn't any planning permission (as the school isn't on the close, but opposite), but, it's extremely annoying when inconsiderate t**ts are blocking your way out as they've parked parallel to each other on either sides of the street. :mad:

    As far as I know, no damage has been done to any cars, but I can totally see where the OP is coming from. Hope you manage to get it sorted OP.

    Personally, I'd probably just go straight to the council first, probably get results quicker than going straight to the business, who might not be bothered. I say this, because they know the rules and regs, but still choose not to tell the parents to go to the other entrance. They must know that it's not right.
  • flyingscotno1
    flyingscotno1 Posts: 1,679 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    terryw wrote: »
    I was referring to the entrance to the building being locked.

    I doubt that's what he meant.

    He meant you lock the gate onto the street. Nobody will park if they can't get in through and entrance on that street being the theory.
  • atrixblue.-MFR-.
    atrixblue.-MFR-. Posts: 6,887 Forumite
    terryw wrote: »
    I was referring to the entrance to the building being locked.

    then why has the post dissapeared well not dissapeared i quoted it but all the same why remove it if you were true to your word.

    to the OP's original question NO they couldnt sue the council, what damages and out of pocket expenses have the council incurred them directly as a result of their negligance, nothing, if the cars are getting damaged by drivers using the wrong entrance or exit then that is negligance on the driver of the vehicle and they would have to go down the long expensive road of making a claim against the driver through insurers.

    my reccommendation is to write a politely worded letter as to my first post.
  • terryw
    terryw Posts: 4,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    then why has the post dissapeared well not dissapeared i quoted it but all the same why remove it if you were true to your word.
    I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. I have not removed or amended any posts. You quoted my post No 20 which is still there, never having moved or "dissapeared".

    Until the OP returns with details of the planning permission conditions
    there is little further that can be advised or discussed.
    "If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
    Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools"
    Extract from "If" by Rudyard Kipling
  • atrixblue.-MFR-.
    atrixblue.-MFR-. Posts: 6,887 Forumite
    terryw wrote: »
    I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. I have not removed or amended any posts. You quoted my post No 20 which is still there, never having moved or "dissapeared".

    Until the OP returns with details of the planning permission conditions
    there is little further that can be advised or discussed.

    apologies, just didnt see it on my tablet, ill discuss what i like here, youll probably find the op has had their answer they are looking for, and not getting sucked into debate about anything. she asked can she sue council answer is no, and advice to write to the buisiness, i would see no reason to post back with the answers already given and advice anyway.
  • terryw
    terryw Posts: 4,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    edited 22 May 2013 at 3:07AM
    apologies, just didnt see it on my tablet, ill discuss what i like here, youll probably find the op has had their answer they are looking for, and not getting sucked into debate about anything. she asked can she sue council answer is no, and advice to write to the buisiness, i would see no reason to post back with the answers already given and advice anyway.

    Thank you for your apologies.

    The OP is called "Nathan" and not a "she".
    "If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
    Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools"
    Extract from "If" by Rudyard Kipling
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 260K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.