PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Suing for illegal eviction

Hi,

I have engaged a solicitor (no win no fee) and I am proceeding with suing my LL for Illegal Eviction and late protection of my deposit.

Its in the very early stages, but I was hoping someone could give me some advice on the actual procedure.

I assume the solicitor will now contact my ex LL but I am unsure what happens then.

Is the LL likely to settle before it goes to court? My solicitor has told me the LL doesn't have a leg to stand on.

If it does go to court, will I need to attend?

Obviously I will discuss all this with the solicitor when I can but I am finding the whole thing a little overwhelming at the moment.

Any advice you can offer would be appreciated. I can supply more details if needed.

Many thanks
«13456

Comments

  • thesaint
    thesaint Posts: 4,324 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Ask your solicitor.
    Well life is harsh, hug me don't reject me.
  • RichardD1970
    RichardD1970 Posts: 3,796 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    As above, surely the point of appointing a solicitor is to get processional advice so you don't need to ask random strangers on an internet forum who have no idea of the circumstances.
  • princeofpounds
    princeofpounds Posts: 10,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Of course your solicitor is going to be the right person to ask for all this, as the others say, but bearing that in mind here are some thoughts.
    Is the LL likely to settle before it goes to court?

    We don't know, and I doubt your solicitor knows either. However, if you are willing to settle for a reasonable amount, it would be very logical for the LL to settle. He might not be logical though.
    If it does go to court, will I need to attend?

    You may not have to technically, but it would probably be better if you do attend. Your lawyer will advise you on what to do here.
  • Yorkie1
    Yorkie1 Posts: 12,082 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Just one minor point - illegal eviction is a criminal offence, so you don't "sue" in the civil courts for this. Make sure your solicitor knows his/her stuff and doesn't get the terminology wrong.
  • princeofpounds
    princeofpounds Posts: 10,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Well it's a good point and not minor!

    It's one thing to consider if a settlement is offered; the LL would escape a criminal record. Money may hit them harder though, depends what they value.
  • hawk30
    hawk30 Posts: 416 Forumite
    Yorkie1 wrote: »
    Just one minor point - illegal eviction is a criminal offence, so you don't "sue" in the civil courts for this. Make sure your solicitor knows his/her stuff and doesn't get the terminology wrong.

    I presume the claim is for damages for unlawful eviction, rather than illegal eviction.
  • Hump
    Hump Posts: 519 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    Housing Act 1988 s27 civil claim for damages
    Protection from Eviction Act 1977 criminal route

    I'd do s27 everytime - but expect a counter claim for unpaid rent/ damage etc
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Hump wrote: »
    Housing Act 1988 s27 civil claim for damages
    Protection from Eviction Act 1977 criminal route

    I'd do s27 everytime - but expect a counter claim for unpaid rent/ damage etc
    Quite.

    Presumably if the OP is 'suing', this is for damages (compensation). This would not be for 'illegal' eviction. It would be via the 1988 Act, and would be a civil action.

    The 1977 Act ('illegal' eviction) would be criminal process - the LL could be subject "to a fine not exceeding £400 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or to both" but the OP would receive nothing.

    Housing Act 1988

    Protection from Eviction Act 1977
  • 45002
    45002 Posts: 802 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Both civil and criminal action is possible...

    OP can sue for damages in civil courts once criminal prosecution by local council,if that was the case !
    Advice given on Assured and Regulated Tenancy, Further advice should always be sought from a Solicitor....
  • neverdespairgirl
    neverdespairgirl Posts: 16,501 Forumite
    Yorkie1 wrote: »
    Just one minor point - illegal eviction is a criminal offence, so you don't "sue" in the civil courts for this. Make sure your solicitor knows his/her stuff and doesn't get the terminology wrong.

    It's both. It's a criminal offence, and also a civil cause of action.
    Well it's a good point and not minor!

    It's one thing to consider if a settlement is offered; the LL would escape a criminal record. Money may hit them harder though, depends what they value.


    That's completely wrong. The settlement or otherwise of a civil action for unlawful eviction has nothing to do with any criminal prosecution.
    ...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.