PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that dates on the Forum are not currently showing correctly. Please bear with us while we get this fixed, and see Site feedback for updates.
Buying a house which needs work

b21playa
Posts: 80 Forumite
Hi all
Bit of a saga here, which has been going on for some time now.
Had an offer accepted of a property on 15th feb and following a valuation from lender, I was told I needed to obtain sulphate test to the ground floor. This was done, and the results came which indicated high levels on sulphate, and the entire ground floor needed to be replaced.
This was bought to the attention of the estate agents, and the costs were negotiated with the the vendors who agreed to pay via an allowance. My lender were not happy with this, and have stated that the floors need to be replaced and re-inspected before any advance.
Now, the sellers can not afford to do this outright, and the agents have offered the following solution. We exchange contracts (solicitor suggested adding a clause that if lender are not happy, my deposit is returned to me), the floors are replaced and following re-inspection, completion is done.
What are people's views to this solution?
I appreciate any comments and/or advice
Thanks
B21
Bit of a saga here, which has been going on for some time now.
Had an offer accepted of a property on 15th feb and following a valuation from lender, I was told I needed to obtain sulphate test to the ground floor. This was done, and the results came which indicated high levels on sulphate, and the entire ground floor needed to be replaced.
This was bought to the attention of the estate agents, and the costs were negotiated with the the vendors who agreed to pay via an allowance. My lender were not happy with this, and have stated that the floors need to be replaced and re-inspected before any advance.
Now, the sellers can not afford to do this outright, and the agents have offered the following solution. We exchange contracts (solicitor suggested adding a clause that if lender are not happy, my deposit is returned to me), the floors are replaced and following re-inspection, completion is done.
What are people's views to this solution?
I appreciate any comments and/or advice
Thanks
B21
0
Comments
-
So you exchange, pay for the floors to be done (£,£££), lender is not happy with something, you can’t complete, invoke clause in contract, you get your deposit back.
But what about the cost of doing the floor?
I wouldn’t touch it with a barge pole, I would either want the price reduced (and cover the renovation myself) or, it done on the vendors own bank account and then pay the full agreed price.0 -
martinsurrey wrote: »So you exchange, pay for the floors to be done (£,£££), lender is not happy with something, you can’t complete, invoke clause in contract, you get your deposit back.
But what about the cost of doing the floor?
I wouldn’t touch it with a barge pole, I would either want the price reduced (and cover the renovation myself) or, it done on the vendors own bank account and then pay the full agreed price.
Hi
The cost of replacing floors would be taken from my deposit from what I gather, so I would only be paying the initial agreed offer. I have asked the agents to get back to me on how the vendors anticipate paying that back to me, should my lender not be happy, and the clause is invoked.
I can not get the cost reduced from offer, as bank have value property at £0, due to floors, and stipulated it must be done first.
They agents first tried to cover the costs via "an allowance" which the solicitor thought was ok. I feared which sounded a bit dodgy (poss mortgage fraud) and spoke to my bank about it, who agreed with me. Now I nearly exchanged at that point. Luckily I didnt, otherwise I would have been truly shafted.0 -
Solicitors seem to think this is the only way to proceed, so most likely the sale will not go through.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 348.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.4K Spending & Discounts
- 240.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 617.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.7K Life & Family
- 254.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards