We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

ESA, Housing Benefit and property inheritance

Options
2

Comments

  • Credit-Crunched
    Credit-Crunched Posts: 2,212 Forumite
    "If you sell soon after you are given the properties, there won't be any GCT to pay."

    ?
  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,571 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    "If you sell soon after you are given the properties, there won't be any GCT to pay."

    ?

    Your liability for GCT is based on any increase in the value between the date of death and the date you sell.
  • zoebuggy
    zoebuggy Posts: 10 Forumite
    Many thanks, you have given me some useful starting points and helped ease my panic (even though the may not be an easy way round my personal situation). Next step is accessing citizens advice and any other free, financial advice services (I can not afford up front private accountants fees).
  • rogerblack
    rogerblack Posts: 9,446 Forumite
    zoebuggy wrote: »
    BUT ...once I have Assets over 16K, I would loose both my Housing Benefit (£85 per week) & Rates Benefit (86%) and also my Employment Support Allowance (£100). So I would loose out financially over £12K.

    I need to check do I get hit by this double benefit loss wammy... of loosing both housing benefit and ESA?

    Are you claiming contributory, or income-related ESA?
    Capital would only matter if it's income-related.

    In principle, a properly setup trust that held the assets, and could not be drawn on by you, but would for example pay for certain living and other expenses (For example, grocery, insurance, ...) would not count as capital for benefits purposes.
    This cannot be arranged directly by you, but would have to be arranged by your mother/...
  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 35,564 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    A trust costs money to administer but if the trust were set up with the brother and sister as trustees, that would be a lot cheaper than letting a solicitor run it.

    Having a lawyer adminster the Trust would be so expensive for so little money that I suspect the solicitor could be reported to the Law Society.
    If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing
  • zoebuggy
    zoebuggy Posts: 10 Forumite
    I was on contributory, but govt changed that to one year only, so now it is income related ESA.
  • neverdespairgirl
    neverdespairgirl Posts: 16,501 Forumite
    zoebuggy wrote: »
    Many thanks, you have given me some useful starting points and helped ease my panic (even though the may not be an easy way round my personal situation). Next step is accessing citizens advice and any other free, financial advice services (I can not afford up front private accountants fees).

    It's not the sort of advice you'll get easily from free services. Firstly, because trusts to protect large sums of money often don't come within the remit of free services, and secondly, because (as a consequence of the first reason) there is unlikely to be any expertise in the area of trusts.

    It's your mother who needs to take advice, really, as it's her property.
    ...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.
  • Brassedoff
    Brassedoff Posts: 1,217 Forumite
    No offence, but if you have assets, don't claim off the tax payer. At least you'll have you self respect back!
  • zoebuggy
    zoebuggy Posts: 10 Forumite
    Have no doubt I am a genuine claimant. I have absolutely no intention of any kind of fraud, it would make me physically sick 24/7.

    The problem to me was if I received this possible asset (which would be well over £16K) I would gain an annual income of £6K ....but loose both my current ESA and my Housing Benefit etc worth 12K.

    If it simply replaced one of the benefits and made me more independent, brilliant I would be happy, but instead the result is that I personally would be very very much worse off.
  • paddedjohn
    paddedjohn Posts: 7,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    You would still get benefits on an income of £6k
    Be Alert..........Britain needs lerts.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.