PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Selling water damaged house

philhoward
philhoward Posts: 37 Forumite
edited 30 April 2013 at 8:44AM in House buying, renting & selling
The house we moved out of a couple of years ago suffered a burst pipe in the loft and took out (at least) half the ceilings in the process. My own fault for not checking the small print, but the insurance claim has been cancelled (they actually voided the policy) so I'm stuck with a house that currently has no water, still got a damaged pipe somewhere, needs the remedial work and I need to sell. Anyone got any tips, websites etc, or possible guesses on how much of the value has been lost because of it? Hopefully will realise enough to pay the Buy-to-Let mortgage on it and pay off the costs already incurred by the insurer that I have to pay back.

Best condition houses in the same street/estate seem to fetch around 120-125k based on a Mouseprice monitor I set up a few years ago.

(last line removed; was an off the cuff comment)

Comments

  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    edited 30 April 2013 at 8:53AM
    philhoward wrote: »
    The house we moved out of a couple of years ago suffered a burst pipe in the loft and took out (at least) half the ceilings in the process. My own fault for not checking the small print, but the insurance claim has been cancelled (they actually voided the policy) ..
    Why did the insurance company void the policy? Had you changed from a residential policy to a LL policy? Left the property empty for an extended period?
    philhoward wrote: »
    so I'm stuck with a house that currently has no water, still got a damaged pipe somewhere, needs the remedial work and I need to sell. Anyone got any tips, websites etc, or possible guesses on how much of the value has been lost because of it? Hopefully will realise enough to pay the Buy-to-Let mortgage on it and pay off the costs already incurred by the insurer that I have to pay back.
    Surely the easiest way is for you to obtain several quotes for the work to be done and do your own sums?
    philhoward wrote: »
    Best condition houses in the same street/estate seem to fetch around 120-125k based on a Mouseprice monitor I set up a few years ago.

    xxxxxxx OP amendedt?
    You may want to remove the last sentence - see forum rules[/quote]

    If you want to sell and it's in a good lettings area talk to the local LL association - they often have a "property for sale" page in their member newsletter
  • philhoward
    philhoward Posts: 37 Forumite
    I hadn't changed the policy as whilst the intention was to let it out, I didn't get round to doing so with pressures of work taking up all my spare time (and trying to stay married as well). Hence remained/renewed as a residential policy. One of those "round to it" jobs that I didn't get round to. As I said initially, my mistake and now costing me dearly. I didn't spot the required occupancy clause in the policy renewal documents.

    I intend to get a quote or two for the work required but was after a ballpark guess - 10,20%? Never looked into it, hence have no idea. Will try a search for the LandLords assocation (assuming thats what the abbreviation stands for?).
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    philhoward wrote: »
    I hadn't changed the policy as whilst the intention was to let it out, I didn't get round to doing so with pressures of work taking up all my spare time (and trying to stay married as well). Hence remained/renewed as a residential policy. One of those "round to it" jobs that I didn't get round to. As I said initially, my mistake and now costing me dearly. I didn't spot the required occupancy clause in the policy renewal documents.
    A lesson that other newbie LLs would do well to heed if letting out their own former home.
    I intend to get a quote or two for the work required but was after a ballpark guess - 10,20%? Never looked into it, hence have no idea. Will try a search for the LandLords assocation (assuming thats what the abbreviation stands for?).
    Yep, LL - landlord
    see https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2666553
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.