We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Insurance price increase after claim help
leetaylor.1138
Posts: 15 Forumite
last year my car was vandalised and set on fire. The police didnt catch the person who did it and I had to claim on my insurance. My policy has now increased, are the insurance companys allowed to discriminate against victimes of crime? and how can i get a cheaper policy?
0
Comments
-
How are they discriminating?
Your car was in an area where thieves/joyriders operate - that increase the risk to the insurer (hence the claim), which then drives the premium up.
You can go on comparison websites (confused.com, gocompare etc) and see if you can get cover for less.
Bu you have made a claim, when that happens the premium goes up.I am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
Greater risk = higher premium.
That's not discrimination, that's assessing the risk and applying a figure to it.0 -
are the insurance companys allowed to discriminate against victimes of crime?
They price on risk and claims history. You had a claim and a vandalised car suggests it is in a higher risk area. No discrimination.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Admiral have put my insurance up by £65 because I was involved in a NO FAULT accident in 2011. They say this is industry standard. I reckon they are breaking the law. Am I right?0
-
Trinovantes wrote: »Admiral have put my insurance up by £65 because I was involved in a NO FAULT accident in 2011. They say this is industry standard. I reckon they are breaking the law. Am I right?
No, you are wrong.0 -
Looksguywalker wrote: »No, you are wrong.
Thanks, but why exactly? How can a non-guilty party be treated as guilty?0 -
Its all about loss and not guilt. They payout from their wallet and are unable to re-cope cash their for its a loss.0
-
They aren't treating you as guilty of anything other than being a higher risk than someone who has not claimed at all.
It's annoying but not illegal.0 -
I don't see how I am a higher risk. Someone drove straight out of a car park without looking and T-Boned me! They admitted liability, their insurer (Direct Line) paid everything and it didn't cost Admiral a penny. Bad luck does not constitute being a higher risk!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards