We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

BTL "fraud"

245

Comments

  • lynzpower wrote: »

    Do you think Ive "pushed prices up" by doing this.


    I think we all agree there is a demand for houses.

    The type of house you can afford to buy at any time depends on your income, existing debt and size of deposit.

    In a simple example, 2 people work together and have the same salary, savings and debt.

    They both see a flat they like it is £100K. Other people who like the flat earn less than them and would have to make an offer below the asking price.

    The 2 runners for this flat, know there is competition. One offers full asking price. The other lies on the mortgage application and offers £5K over the asking price and buys it.

    An identical flat comes up for sale. The EA knows the last one went for £105K and adjusts the asking price accordingly.

    mom HPI for this flat is 5%.

    I know this example is very simplistic but you get the general idea.

    My answer to your question would be that if " bending the truth" allowed you to borrow more than you could naturally afford then yes, I think you have contributed to pushing up prices. ;)

    Take a look at this from over 3 years ago

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3222053.stm
  • lynzpower
    lynzpower Posts: 25,311 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    My answer to your question would be that if " bending the truth" allowed you to borrow more than you could naturally afford then yes, I think you have contributed to pushing up prices.

    but in fact, I COULD afford it, as I continued to pay my parents back and paid the mortgage.

    in any case - if I hadnt had the loan from my parents, but took a loan out of 4k after Id exchanged- would it have really been any moe or less affordable.

    no one legislates at all affordability AFTER youve had your mortgage agreed- or do they
    :beer: Well aint funny how its the little things in life that mean the most? Not where you live, the car you drive or the price tag on your clothes.
    Theres no dollar sign on piece of mind
    This Ive come to know...
    So if you agree have a drink with me, raise your glasses for a toast :beer:
  • Rick62
    Rick62 Posts: 989 Forumite
    If you have to pay it back then yes you have lied, committed fraud and pushed up prices (presumably you've been able to spend £4k more than if they had not lent you the money).

    If however there is no legal agreement on paying it back (well pay it back if you like, when you can) then probably you could treat it as a gift . the key point from the lenders point of view is whether or not it is a 'financial commitment', so an obligation and agreement to pay £100/month would be a commitment while a voluntary understanding to pay it back if and when you like is not a commitment as such.
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • pickles110564
    pickles110564 Posts: 2,374 Forumite
    Sapphire wrote: »
    If BTLs are committing fraud by stating falsely that their BTLs are their first homes to avoid paying tax, then I do object to this and hope the law will come after them. I pay tax - why shouldn't others?

    When tenants give false names to utility company's or catologue company's and flit off without paying LL's what is this called?
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    When tenants give false names to utility company's or catologue company's and flit off without paying LL's what is this called?

    What's your point?
  • PayDay
    PayDay Posts: 346 Forumite
    When tenants give false names to utility company's or catologue company's and flit off without paying LL's what is this called?

    Running a business. LLs should build it into their business plan.
  • lic
    lic Posts: 275 Forumite
    I thought this site was about saving money; not encouraging people, BTL's or renters to steal or cheat.
    If a lender asks you to inform them of all your outgoings, earnings, and where the deposit came, from you are legally bound to tell the truth.
    Should you obtain a loan by making false statements it would normaly be treated by the Police as Fraud. If you lie about where the deposit came from i.e. it was a loan, when the mortgage provider does not allow this it may be treated as 'obtaining a pecuniary advantage'.
    Both offences are punishable by imprisonment.
    Lic.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    If house prices ever fall so reposessions become more common, I think we'll be surprised by the number of people who have used self-cert etc to finance BTL. I did a poll a while back on it and a lot of posters (significant minority) seemed to be of the opinion that it was fine to commit fraud to finance a BTL empire.
    PoorDave wrote: »
    Surely the only person that will be harmed by the above is the person borrowing, so it's fine to lie as long as you don't want sympathy when things go wrong!
    hearts wrote: »
    In this case YES! The rules are supposed to be there to protect the borrower. If he knows what he is doing and is willing to take the chance, including the loss of his deposit if prices fall then WELL DONE YOU! These rules are manipulated( 3 x 5 x 1 20 years etc)so much by the banks Im surprise dthey even bother with them now.

    HE WHO DARES WINS.......
  • Generali, why are you so up tight about BTL'S & people buying property??? :confused:

    You're always kicking up a fuss! :confused:
  • pickles110564
    pickles110564 Posts: 2,374 Forumite
    Generali, why are you so up tight about BTL'S & people buying property??? :confused:

    You're always kicking up a fuss! :confused:

    Because he has not got the b@lls and has the green eyed monster he has to knock hard working homeowners/LL's.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.