We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

First Time Buyers - Enough is Enough!

1161719212229

Comments

  • dougk_2
    dougk_2 Posts: 1,403 Forumite
    Its actually about £190k interest only or £130k Repayment.

    Still enough to buy a 2 bed maisonette or terrace in most parts of the country.
    (if in london then the average salary will be higher).

    Yes the fixed rate will run out eventually but you can get them to cover the whole term if you want.

    Credit card interest rates and other loan rates only affect you if you use them - I don't and never would. I don't beleive in borrowing for anything apart from for a house. If you don't have - you go without.
  • Woby_Tide
    Woby_Tide Posts: 5,344 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    So basically the long and short of it is, that regardless of whether prices crash or stay the same or rise rapidly, the people on both sides of the fence can produce enough statistics, historical averages and interpretations to data that buying a house is neither good nor bad and whichever way you want to look at it another counter argument can be found and twisted to suit that point of view?


    meanmachine: Q" How can a mortgage be six times someone's salary but only 25% of their monthly outgoings?"

    A: Interest rates
  • dougk_2
    dougk_2 Posts: 1,403 Forumite
    I agree W_T.

    There is not a right and wrong answer - its like politics its personal choice.

    There will always be people who cannot afford to buy a house and always people that can. There will always be people who want to buy and those that do not.

    If prices rise there will be some winners and some loosers and if prices crash or drop there will be winners and loosers.

    There are better times to buy a property and worse times to buy (depending on both your financial position an dcircumstances as well as the economic conditions)

    The answer is there is no answer!
  • meanmachine_2
    meanmachine_2 Posts: 2,624 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    dougk wrote:
    There are better times to buy a property and worse times to buy (depending on both your financial position an dcircumstances as well as the economic conditions)

    Correct, and for the "average" person on an "average" wage, May 2005 is the worst possible time to buy a property, based on the age-old income multiplier, perhaps in the history of the UK property market.

    You can dress it up as much as you want, but anyone who borrows six times their salary is going to lose their home at some point, or be forced to sell.

    A 25 year period of history where IR rates don't go back to their historical average? Sorry, that's a gamble I wouldn't recommend my worst enemy makes.
  • dougk_2
    dougk_2 Posts: 1,403 Forumite
    A 25 year period of history where IR rates don't go back to their historical average? Sorry, that's a gamble I wouldn't recommend my worst enemy makes.

    Given that statement surely it make sense to get a 25 year fixed rate at about 5.5% then now while you can?????? ;-)
  • Woby_Tide
    Woby_Tide Posts: 5,344 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Correct, and for the "average" person on an "average" wage, May 2005 is the worst possible time to buy a property, based on the age-old income multiplier, perhaps in the history of the UK property market.

    So September 1992 for example when house price to earnings ratio was around 2.75-3x would have been a better time then yes?
  • meanmachine_2
    meanmachine_2 Posts: 2,624 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Woby_Tide wrote:
    So September 1992 for example when house price to earnings ratio was around 2.75-3x would have been a better time then yes?

    No, provided you had a sizeable amount of equity to offset higher IR rates, the best time would have been in 1994.

    Lots of stock, low prices and a buyer's market. And you would, by now and by today's standards, have a miniscule mortgage.

    I'm not saying never buy. I'm just saying not now (if you can possibly avoid it).
  • nelly_2
    nelly_2 Posts: 17,863 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Id have said yes, paying 3 times rather than six times an amount, for anything would be more favourable. I cant see how it cant be. But your obviously trying to lead it into something, probably an interest rate thing .
  • meanmachine_2
    meanmachine_2 Posts: 2,624 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    dougk wrote:
    Given that statement surely it make sense to get a 25 year fixed rate at about 5.5% then now while you can?????? ;-)

    No thanks.

    Doubtless, 10 years down the line we'll end up in the Eurozone and tied to low rates of 2%, regardless of its impact on the economy (see Germany).
  • deemy2004
    deemy2004 Posts: 6,201 Forumite
    Pal wrote:
    If I recall correctly, on a recent thread I argued that house price falls in the region of 50% were entirely possible and you poo-pooed the idea. Changed your mind? ;)


    LOL :)

    The last calc was from First Buyer heaven :)

    First one will be most probably so something in the region of 10% or so....After that I don't know, too many what if's... still is fun to contemplate a 50% drop :D
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.