PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Help: Chimney breast removed - need structural support in roof space!?

Hi,

I wonder if you can help me as I'm a little lost. I'm buying a small, purpose built, 1930s build, 2 bedroom, top floor maisonette flat. The building survey has just come back and has mentioned this:

"The chimney breast within the rear bedroom has been removed. The remaining chimney masonry remains within the roof space. However the masonry appears to be unsupported. This is urgent and the remaining structure must be supported. You will need the advice of a structural engineer and all works must be carried out with local authority approvals".

I am considering going back to the vendor asking whether or not these works were done in the course of her ownership. I'll also probably be asking for a reduction in price to cover the costs of the works. My question is does anyone know roughly (and I mean roughly - a ballpark would be appreciated) how much this type of job would cost and what it would entail?

I note that the surveyor used the phrase 'APPEARS to be unsupported' so it may actually be supported!

Guidance welcomed.

Thanks

Comments

  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    The supports might well be in the roof area and can be inspected, as it is unlikely that the MV will have done more than a head and shoulders inspection of the roof area.

    It depends who under the lease is responsible for the roof and chimney.

    it is common that in a one up one down that the upper flat has responsibility for the upper half, inside and out, in which case it is a simple matter of doing the inspection and if remedial works are required, their cost and to what extent they affect the value.

    if the exterior and structure are retained by the freeholder( and your lease is of the interior up to and including the plaster ) then you will need to see if the V or earlier owner obtained landlord's permission for the alterations and get a copy of the consent. if not then the inspection is needed and retrospective consent should be obtained.

    Do make sure that you see if building regulations consent was obtained as well.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • I had exactly the same problem, the chimney was removed from the ground floor and 2nd floor but not in the roof for some unknown reason (Don't ask me why).

    The chimney breast was only supported by a piece on timber and the brackets were incorrect placed. It was not compliant with building regs either.

    To install a new RSJ (rolled steel joist) was quoted at £695, and i knocked the price of the purchase sale.
  • I have an update and I'd like some advice. Would this put you off a house purchase... should I walk away?

    Following the building survey saying there was no structural support for a chimney breast in the roof space, a structural engineer surveyed the property at the vendor's expense. Although I am yet to receive the written report, it has been verbally confirmed that there is no:

    a) support to the chimney breast in the roof space; and
    b) support to the purlins in the roof space. The timber props need to be re-instated.

    I have said to the estate agent that if I am to proceed, the vendor will need to have these works done prior to exchange of contracts AND it must be done by a builder who I vet and approve of. Ideally I just want to go on the federation of master builders website and find someone off of there to do it.

    As a whole, I think the property is a good purchase for me in terms of space, price, mortgage affordability and so on. I am just wondering if I am biting off more than I can chew here? There are just a lot of 'what ifs' that concern me.

    We are quite far down the conveyancing process now with my offer having been accepted end of February.

    What are your thoughts?

    Thanks
  • Kayalana99
    Kayalana99 Posts: 3,626 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker I've been Money Tipped!
    Its up to you if you want to walk away it depends how much you want this property and what else is in your area.

    I was going to suggest, but you said it yourself that you make sure all work is done before you buy and keep the same offer in place as it saves you ALOT of hassle + you know its sorted then as you never know more issues may come up...quotes can go over budget etc.

    Id probally walk away if vendor refused to be honest but not otherwise unless thier were other propertys avaible.
    People don't know what they want until you show them.
  • Thanks.

    I'll also have to consider whether I want the vendor to seek retrospective building regulations certification for the works so it helps me upon sale of the property. Although she won't know if the works were done before 1984 which, I believe, doesn't require certification..
  • chelly78
    chelly78 Posts: 61 Forumite
    Xmas Saver!
    Same thing happened when we bought our house. Both chimney breasts removed leaving the stacks only. The front one was correctly supported on metal brackets but the rear one had no support. After a bit of discussion the vendors ended up paying to have the rear stack removed and the roof repaired where the stack had been. Initially they wanted us to pay for it, then they suggested 50% each but our solicitor advised otherwise. They also had an idemnity policy but in the words of our solicitor that's not much good if the chimney stack falls on you!
  • thelem
    thelem Posts: 774 Forumite
    Out of interest, why is the plan to support the chimney stack. Wouldn't it be better to remove it, or is that a much bigger job?
    Note: Unless otherwise stated, my property related posts refer to England & Wales. Please make sure you state if you are discussing Scotland or elsewhere as laws differ.
  • DRP
    DRP Posts: 4,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    thelem wrote: »
    Out of interest, why is the plan to support the chimney stack. Wouldn't it be better to remove it, or is that a much bigger job?


    i'd guess costlier (than the £695 quoted in a previous post) as you have to have a couple of fellas on the roof for a few days at least ...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.