📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Credit Rating: Very Poor.

Options
2»

Comments

  • jonesMUFCforever
    jonesMUFCforever Posts: 28,898 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    In a word yes.
  • matttye
    matttye Posts: 4,828 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Debt-free and Proud!
    In a word yes.

    Seems like a very archaic way of judging someone's creditworthiness, especially a young person, but I guess that's just the way it is.

    Cheers!
    What will your verse be?

    R.I.P Robin Williams.
  • sharpy2010
    sharpy2010 Posts: 2,471 Forumite
    Why should they judge someones credit worthiness based on their age?
  • matttye
    matttye Posts: 4,828 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Debt-free and Proud!
    sharpy2010 wrote: »
    Why should they judge someones credit worthiness based on their age?

    I said age but that was the wrong way of explaining what I'm talking about. I was tying age in with experience/knowing how to deal with debt/credit.

    What I really mean is that you should be able to demonstrate a lesson learnt. Defaults are prejudicial if you've managed your finances well ever since. Six years is a really long time for them to be on your credit report.

    What if they came off after four/five years if you have no further late payments/defaults with any other lender?

    Seems very unfair that someone can be judged for something that happened up to six years ago if they've had a lot of non-problematic more recent agreements, as this demonstrates an ability to handle credit well. I think computers just say no when they see defaults.
    What will your verse be?

    R.I.P Robin Williams.
  • sharpy2010
    sharpy2010 Posts: 2,471 Forumite
    I couldn't agree more with your post. Six years is too long for bad credit to stay on your file, and personally I believe three years at most would be fine.

    Six years is long enough for someone to think "oh sod it, it'll take forever to get my credit back on track, I just won't bother".
  • jonesMUFCforever
    jonesMUFCforever Posts: 28,898 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    sharpy2010 wrote: »
    Why should they judge someones credit worthiness based on their age?
    Someone aged say 20 with little history of borrowing and repayment how much would you lend him/her?
    Someone aged say 40 with a history of repaying back what they borrow - would you consider this to a good bet?
    Someone aged 40 say with a list of late payments/defaults etc would you lend more to them?

    Just 3 scenarios the lenders would consider - obviously the computer generated matrix affecting everyone is much more sophisticated than that but the main problem we have with credit today is that it is too easily available even today with banks supposedly not lending.
    People who are turned down are turned down for a reason - in most cases they cannot afford it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.